Symptom clusters in patients with advanced cancer in an early-phase clinical trials clinic.

Authors

null

Goldy George

Department of Symptom Research, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Goldy George , Eucharia Chiege Iwuanyanwu , Karen O Anderson , Sarina Anne Piha-Paul , Aung Naing , Filip Janku , Vivek Subbiah , Xin Shelley Wang , Qiuling Shi , Tito R. Mendoza , David S. Hong , Charles S. Cleeland , Alizeh Yusuf

Organizations

Department of Symptom Research, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase 1 Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Other

Background: Few data exist on patient-reported outcomes, specifically symptoms, in patients with advanced cancer who seek or are in treatment in phase I clinical trials of molecular targeted agents (phase I patients). We explored patient clusters based on symptom severity, and examined associated factors. Methods: Phase I patients completed the validated core MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (with 13 symptom and 6 symptom interference items, each rated on a 0-10 scale) and the Profile of Mood States. ECOG performance status was assessed. Cluster analysis was used. Results: In phase I patients (N = 248, 51% female, 90% ECOG 0-1, and 52% ≥ 60y), symptoms with highest reported mean severity were fatigue (4.6), drowsiness (3.7), pain (3.6), and lack of sleep (3.0). Highest symptom-related interference was with work (3.5), activity (3.4), and enjoyment of life (3.4). Two natural patient clusters based on reported symptom severity were seen: 38% of patients were in the high symptoms cluster (HSC), and 62% were in the low symptoms cluster (LSC). HSC patients reported greater tension, depression, anger, confusion and lower vigor (p < 0.001), were more likely to have poor PS (ECOG > = 2) (16.5% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.003) and reported higher symptom-related interference (5.1 vs. 1.8, p < 0.001) than LSC patients. Cluster membership did not vary by current enrollment on a phase I clinical trial (p > 0.05) or by the number of cycles completed (6.8 vs. 6.4 cycles, p > 0.05). Patients on a phase I trial reported less dyspnea (1.0 vs. 1.95, p < 0.001) and vomiting (0.53 vs. 1.07, p < 0.029) than patients not enrolled, but did not differ in other symptoms. Patients < 60y of age on a trial were more likely to be in the HSC than patients ≥ 60 y (60% vs. 41%, p < 0.038). Conclusions: Patient-reported symptoms, particularly fatigue, drowsiness, pain and lack of sleep should be routinely assessed in phase I clinics, potentially improving attribution of adverse events. Also, current enrollment on a phase 1 trial does not appear to adversely impact symptoms. Treatment of symptoms may include counseling, especially for younger patients, given their higher reported symptom severity. Patient-reported outcomes can complement physician assessment to enhance treatment plans.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Developmental Therapeutics—Clinical Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Track

Developmental Therapeutics and Translational Research

Sub Track

Conduct of Clinical Research

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 2540)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.2540

Abstract #

2540

Poster Bd #

240

Abstract Disclosures