Effect of baseline carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level on overall survival (OS) in NAPOLI-1: A randomized phase III study of MM-398 (nal-IRI), with or without 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV), versus 5-FU/LV in metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPAC) previously treated with gemcitabine (gem)-based therapy.

Authors

null

Li-Tzong Chen

National Health Research Institutes (NHRI) - National Institute of Cancer Research, Taipei, Taiwan

Li-Tzong Chen , Jens T Siveke , Andrea Wang-Gillam , Richard Hubner , Shubham Pant , Tomislav Dragovich , Vincent M. Chung , David Z. Chang , Paul J. Ross , Prasad Cooray , Niall C. Tebbutt , Fabio A. Franke , Bruce Belanger , Navreet Dhindsa , Floris de Jong , Khalid Mamlouk , Daniel D. Von Hoff

Organizations

National Health Research Institutes (NHRI) - National Institute of Cancer Research, Taipei, Taiwan, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU Muenchen, Munich, Germany, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Altrincham, United Kingdom, Oklahoma University Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, Virginia Oncology Associates - Hampton, Newport News, VA, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom, Box Hill Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia, Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital Olivia Newton-John Cancer & Wellness Centre, Heidelberg, Australia, Hospital de Caridade de Ijuí Avenida David José Martins, Ijui-RS, Brazil, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, Baxalta GmbH, Zürich, Switzerland, TGen and Banner Health, Scottsdale, AZ

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: CA19-9 correlates with response to therapy and OS in patients with mPAC. NAPOLI-1 evaluated nal-IRI, a nanoliposomal formulation of irinotecan, with or without 5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV in mPAC patients previously treated with gem-based therapy. nal-IRI+5-FU/LV significantly improved OS (primary endpoint) vs 5-FU/LV (6.1 mo vs 4.2 mo; unstratified hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67; P = 0.012). CA19-9 response (≥50% decline from baseline) was superior with nal-IRI+5FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV (29% vs 9%; P = 0.0006). nal-IRI alone did not show a statistical improvement in OS. Methods: Patients with baseline CA19-9 measurements were divided into quartiles to evaluate the treatment effect pattern of CA19-9 in the nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and 5-FU/LV arms. Quartile ranges were based on 404 available CA19-9 values from randomized patients (N = 417). Unstratified Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Effect of baseline CA19-9 on OS, time to response, progression-free survival (PFS), and response were assessed. Results: Of patients randomized to receive nal-IRI+5-FU/LV (n = 117) or 5-FU/LV enrolled contemporaneously (n = 119), 218 received study drug and had a baseline CA19-9 measurement. nal-IRI+5-FU/LV had a greater treatment effect on OS and PFS with higher CA19-9 level relative to 5-FU/LV. Higher treatment termination rates occurred in both study arms with higher CA19-9 quartile, but no patterns of subsequent therapy were observed. Conclusions: In patients with mPAC previously treated with gem-based therapy, nal-IRI+5-FU/LV significantly improved OS, supported by PFS and response rate. CA19-9 serum levels can provide important information with regard to OS. Clinical trial information: NCT01494506

CA19-9 level (U/
mL)
Q1
< 120
Q2
120 to < 1549
Q3
1542 to <
12,815
Q4
≥ 12,815
Median OS, mo (n)
nal-IRI+5-FU/LV
(n = 115)
7.6 (n = 27)6.7 (n = 35)6.1 (n = 27)4.6 (n = 26)
5-FU/LV
(n = 103)
7.2 (n = 31)6.1 (n = 25)3.8 (n = 21)1.9 (n = 26)
HR for Death
(95% CI)
1.12 (0.57,
2.22)
0.74 (0.37,
1.48)
0.43 (0.22,
0.84)
0.35 (0.19,
0.64)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Pancreatic Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01494506

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr e15740)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.e15740

Abstract #

e15740

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts