National Health Research Institutes, National Institute of Cancer Research, Taipei, Taiwan
Li-Tzong Chen , Jens T Siveke , Andrea Wang-Gillam , Richard Hubner , Shubham Pant , Tomislav Dragovich , Vincent M. Chung , David Z. Chang , Paul J. Ross , Prasad Cooray , Niall C. Tebbutt , Fabio A. Franke , Bruce Belanger , Navreet Dhindsa , Floris De Jong , Khalid Mamlouk , Daniel D. Von Hoff
Background: CA19-9 has been shown to correlate with response to therapy and OS in patients with mPAC. NAPOLI-1, a randomized phase 3 study evaluated nal-IRI, a nanoliposomal formulation of irinotecan, with or without 5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV in patients with mPAC previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. Nal-IRI+5-FU/LV significantly improved OS (primary endpoint) vs 5-FU/LV (6.1 mo vs 4.2 mo; unstratified hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67; P = 0.012). CA19-9 response (≥50% decline from baseline) was superior with nal-IRI+5FU/LV compared with 5-FU/LV (29% vs 9%; P=0.0006). Nal-IRI alone did not show a statistical improvement in survival. Methods: Patients with a recorded baseline CA19-9 measurement were divided into quartiles to evaluate the treatment effect pattern of CA19-9 from nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and 5-FU/LV arms. Quartile ranges were based on 404 available CA19-9 values from randomized patients (N=417). Unstratified Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate HRs and corresponding 95% CIs. Effect of baseline CA19-9 on time to response, progression-free survival, and response will be presented. Results: Of patients randomized to receive nal-IRI+5-FU/LV (n = 117) or 5-FU/LV enrolled contemporaneously (n = 119), 218 received study drug and had a baseline CA19-9 measurement. Results show a greater treatment effect on OS with higher CA19-9 level relative to 5-FU/LV. Conclusions: In patients with mPAC previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy, nal-IRI+5-FU/LV significantly improved OS supported by progression free survival and objective response rate. The CA19-9 serum level can provide important information with regards to overall survival. Clinical trial information: NCT01494506
Q1 CA19-9 <120 | Q2 120≤ CA19-9 <1,549 | Q3 1,542≤ CA19-9 <12,815 | Q4 CA19-9 ≥12,815 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Median OS, months (n in each group) | ||||
nal-IRI+5-FU/LV (n = 115) | 7.6 (n = 27) | 6.7 (n = 35) | 6.1 (n = 27) | 4.6 (n = 26) |
5-FU/LV (n = 103) | 7.2 (n = 31) | 6.1 (n = 25) | 3.8 (n = 21) | 1.9 (n = 26) |
HR for death (95% CI) | 1.12 (0.57, 2.22) | 0.74 (0.37, 1.48) | 0.43 (0.22, 0.84) | 0.35 (0.19, 0.64) |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
First Author: Li-Tzong Chen
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Sreenivasa R Chandana
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Takahiro Tsushima
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Kohei Shitara