Baseline plasma matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) to predict overall survival (OS) benefit from bevacizumab (BEV) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM): Retrospective analysis of AVAglio.

Authors

Olivier Chinot

Olivier L. Chinot

Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, CHU Timone, Marseille, France

Olivier L. Chinot , Josep Garcia , Sylvie Romain , Cedric Revil , Timothy Cloughesy , Warren P. Mason , Ryo Nishikawa , Roger Henriksson , Frank Saran , Antoine F. Carpentier , Khe Hoang-Xuan , Petr Kavan , Dana Cernea , Alba Ariela Brandes , Yannick Kerloeguen , Christoph Mancao , L'Houcine Ouafik , Lauren E. Abrey , Wolfgang Wick , Emeline Tabouret

Organizations

Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, CHU Timone, Marseille, France, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan, Regional Cancer Center Stockholm and Umea University, Stockholm/Umeå, Sweden, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, United Kingdom, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris 13 University, Hopital Avicenne, Bobigny, France, APHP, UPMC, CRICM, Department of Neurology Mazarin, CHU Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, Oncology Institute "Ion Chiricuta", Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Azienda USL Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy, University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: BEV + radiotherapy/temozolomide (RT/TMZ) improves progression-free survival (PFS) (vs placebo [PBO] + RT/TMZ) in newly diagnosedGBM, but this does not translate into an OS benefit (AVAglio/NCT00943826). Data from recurrent GBM (Tabouret, Neuro Oncol 2014, 2015) suggest that MMP9 and MMP2 plasma levels may predict BEV-related tumor response and correlate with improved OS. Evaluation of MMP9 and MMP2 as potential biomarkers for patients likely to derive OS benefit from BEV is needed. We present data from a retrospective analysis of AVAglio, which assessed whether MMP9 baseline levels predicted OS benefit from BEV in newly diagnosed GBM. Methods: MMP9 and MMP2 levels were assessed (ELISA; R&D Systems) in baselineplasma samples (after surgery/before treatment) from 577/921 patients enrolled in AVAglio (PBO n=294; BEV n=283). Post-hoc analysis and PFS/OS multivariate models including MMP9–treatment interactions were carried out. Results: MMP9 distribution at baseline was comparable between arms (median [Quartile1–3]: PBO 82.4ng/mL [44.8–160.3]; BEV 83.6ng/mL [43.8–133.8]). Patient characteristics were generally balanced between MMP9 subgroups (per quartile), including for known prognostic factors. Patients with low MMP9 (<Quartile1) derived significant OS benefit from BEV, which translated into a median 5.2-month OS increase (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34−0.76, p=0.0009; median 13.6 [PBO] vs 18.8 [BEV] months); a consistent PFS benefit was seen (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.24−0.54, p<0.0001). In patients with high MMP9, there was a trend for the HR to favor the PBO arm for OS (>Quartile 3 HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.80−1.81). No clear prognostic value of MMP9 was shown, although an interaction was seen between treatment and MMP9 (p=0.03) for OS. MMP2 (by quartile) did not exhibit prognostic or predictive value. Conclusions: A post-hoc analysis of AVAglio suggested that baselineplasma MMP9 levels were predictive of OS benefit from the addition of BEV to RT/TMZ in newly diagnosed GBM. Clinical trial information: NCT00943826

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Central Nervous System Tumors

Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Sub Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00943826

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 2020)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.2020

Abstract #

2020

Poster Bd #

209

Abstract Disclosures