A randomized, open-label, phase II study of CC-486 (oral azacitidine), alone or in combination with durvalumab (MEDI4736), in patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) unresponsive to prior parenteral azacitidine or decitabine.

Authors

null

Pierre Fenaux

Hôpital Saint-Louis/Université, Paris, France

Pierre Fenaux , Lewis R. Silverman , Ghulam J. Mufti , John Francis Seymour , Rami S. Komrokji , Stefan Faderl , Du Hung Lam , Michele Sharr-McMahon , C L. Beach , Guillermo Garcia-Manero

Organizations

Hôpital Saint-Louis/Université, Paris, France, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ, Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Whileparenteral hypomethylating agents (HMAs) induce hematologic response in ~50% of pts with IPSS higher-risk MDS, options are very limited for nonresponding pts who are at high risk of progression to AML and death. In a previous study of pts who had received prior HMA therapy (n = 7), extended dosing of CC-486 resulted in an overall response rate of 29%. Other promising strategies for cancer therapy are emerging, including blockade of the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/PD ligand-1 (PD-L1) pathway by immune checkpoint inhibitors. In early-phase studies, durvalumab (MEDI4736), an anti-PD-L1 human antibody, was well tolerated and associated with durable responses in pts with solid tumors. PD-L1 expression on myeloblasts is upregulated in MDS pts following HMA exposure. This randomized, open-label, phase II study evaluates the efficacy and safety of CC-486 ± durvalumab in pts unable to tolerate, or who fail to respond to, prior HMA therapy. Methods: This study consists of a run-in phase exploring the safety and tolerability of CC-486 ± durvalumab, followed by a randomized treatment phase (Table). Pts aged ≥ 18 years with FAB-defined MDS ( < 30% marrow blasts) who failed on prior HMA therapy are eligible. Primary endpoint is proportion of pts achieving an objective response (hematologic improvement, partial response, complete remission [CR], or marrow CR). Secondary endpoints include overall survival, time to/duration of response, progression-free survival, AML progression, and safety. Exploratory analyses include molecular biomarker assessments. Enrollment in the CC-486 arm began in July 2015. Target enrollment is 194 pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02281084

Safety run-in.

Dose level, N ≥ 3CC-486, twice dailyDurvalumab
Starting dose200 mg 21/28d1,500 mg i.v.
1/28d
−1150 mg 21/28d
−2100 mg 21/28d
−3100 mg 14/28d

Randomized treatment (1:1)

Allocation2 phasesDose
CC-486SD≥ 3 responders in
16 pts = additional
25 pts
Based on safety run-in data
≤ 6 28d cycles
PD
CC-486 + durvalumabSD
PD

d, day; i.v., intravenous; PD, progressive disease; SD, stable disease.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Sub Track

Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02281084

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr TPS7078)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.TPS7078

Abstract #

TPS7078

Poster Bd #

66b

Abstract Disclosures