Final analysis of stage 1 data from a randomized phase II study of PEGPH20 plus nab-Paclitaxel/gemcitabine in stage IV previously untreated pancreatic cancer patients (pts), utilizing Ventana companion diagnostic assay.

Authors

null

Andrea J. Bullock

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

Andrea J. Bullock , Sunil R. Hingorani , Xionghua W. Wu , Ping Jiang , Dimitrios Chondros , Sihem Khelifa , Carrie Aldrich , Jie Pu , Andrew Eugene Hendifar

Organizations

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, Halozyme Therapeutics, San Diego, CA, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Poor outcome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is associated partly with stromal hyaluronan (HA) accumulation, which compromises chemotherapy perfusion. PEGPH20 (PEGylated recombinant human hyaluronidase) potentiates chemotherapy by degrading HA. An ongoing, phase II, randomized study is comparing PEGPH20 + nab-paclitaxel (Nab) + Gemcitabine (Gem) (PAG) vs Nab+Gem (AG) in untreated Stage IV PDA. Interim data were presented at ASCO 2015 using a prototype assay to determine the HA-high subpopulation. Final efficacy data are now available with a newly developed Ventana HA companion diagnostic assay and scoring algorithm, which identifies HA-high (staining in the extracellular matrix [ECM] ≥ 50% of tumor surface) pts. Methods: Pts received PEGPH20 3 µg/kg twice weekly (C1), then weekly (C2+) with standard AG dosing. The protocol was amended after a temporary clinical hold (Apr-Jul 2014) for an imbalance in thromboembolic (TE) events to exclude high-TE-risk pts and add enoxaparin (LMWH) prophylaxis to both treatment arms. Primary endpoints are PFS and TE events. PFS and ORR data through Dec 2014 are for pts enrolled up to clinical hold (Stage 1); TE data through Dec 2015 (Stage 2) are outlined below. Results: 135 pts were treated (74 PAG, 61 AG). PFS results are shown below (median follow-up 7 mo). In HA-high pts receiving PAG vs AG, ORR was 55% (1 CR) vs 33%. TE events (PAG vs AG) were: Stage 1 (no LMWH) 42% vs 25%; Stage 2 (+LMWH 1 mg/kg/d) 7% vs 4%; overall (+LMWH 40 mg/d or 1 mg/kg/d) 12% vs 9%. No Grade 5 events have occurred with 1 mg/kg/day LMWH. Conclusions: Pts with HA-high tumors receiving PAG vs AG showed clinically meaningful improvements in PFS and ORR. TE events reduced with LMWH. A global phase III trial of PAG is scheduled to initiate in Q1 2016. Clinical Trial Information: NCT01839487.

PopulationmPFS, mo
Hazard Ratio [95% CI]
PAGAG
Treated5.5 (n = 74)5.2 (n = 61)0.73 [0.46-1.15]
HA-High (n = 43
w/ evaluable HA data)
9.2 (n = 22)6.3 (n = 21)0.48 [0.16-1.48]
HA-Low (n = 75
w/ evaluable HA data)
5.3 (n = 44)4.3 (n = 31)0.69 [0.38-1.25]

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Pancreatic Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01839487

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 4104)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.4104

Abstract #

4104

Poster Bd #

96

Abstract Disclosures