Laparoscopy-assisted versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: Results from a randomized phase II multicenter clinical trial (COACT 1001).

Authors

null

Young Woo Kim

Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy & Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea

Young Woo Kim , Young-Kyu Park , Hong Man Yoon , Ji Yeon Park , Keun Won Ryu , Young-Joon Lee , Oh Jeong , Ki Young Yoon , Jun Ho Lee , Sang Eog Lee , Wansik Yu , Sang-Ho Jeong , Taebong Kim , Sohee Kim , Byung-Ho Nam

Organizations

Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy & Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, South Korea, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea, Center for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi, South Korea, Gyengsang National University Hospital, Jinju-si, South Korea, Gosin University Gospel Hospital, Pusan-si, South Korea, SAMSUNG MEDICAL CENTER, Korea, Seoul, South Korea, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon-si, South Korea, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea; Gastric Cancer Center, Daegu, South Korea, Gyengsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, South Korea, Dae Gu Veterans Hospital, Deagu-si, South Korea, National Cancer Center, Korea, Goyang-Si, Korea, The Republic of, Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: For advanced gastric cancer (AGC), D2 gastrectomy is the standard treatment worldwide, and this procedure shows improved survival. One systematic review and several retrospective studies showed that overall survival rate and disease-free survival following laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy for AGC was not significantly different from ODG. In addition, we showed that the compliance rate of D2 lymph node dissection in LADG was not different from that in ODG in gastric cancer patients. Laparoscopic D2 gastrectomies are technically challenging, and their oncologic safety has not been proven by a prospective randomized controlled trial. This study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized phase II study to evaluate the feasibility of LADG with D2 lymph node dissection compared with ODG for AGC treatment. Methods: Patients with cT2-T4a and cN0-2 (AJCC 7thstaging system) distal gastric cancer were randomly but not blindingly assigned to LADG or ODG groups using fixed block sizes with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The primary endpoint was the noncompliance rate of the lymph node dissection, which was used to evaluate feasibility. Secondary endpoints included 3-year disease-free survival, 5-year overall survival, complications, and surgical stress response. Results: Between Jun 2010 and Oct 2011,204 patients were enrolled and underwent either LADG (n = 105) or ODG (n = 99). Of those, 196 patients (100 in LADG and 96 in ODG) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. There were no significant differences in the overall noncompliance rate of lymph node dissection between LADG and ODG groups (47.0% and 43.2%, respectively; p = 0.648). In the subgroup analysis, the noncompliance rate in the LADG group was significantly higher than in the ODG group for clinical stage III disease (52.0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.043). Three-year disease-free survival was not different in between the groups (LADG, 80.1%; ODG, 81.9%; p = 0.448). Postoperative complication rate and surgical stress response were not different between the groups. Conclusions: LADG was feasible for AGC treatment based on the noncompliance rate of D2 lymph node dissection. Clinical trial information: NCT01088204

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Esophageal or Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01088204

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 4028)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.4028

Abstract #

4028

Poster Bd #

20

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Shunji Endo

First Author: Kazuaki Shibuya

First Author: Masaru Komatsu