Short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer compared with open gastrectomy.

Authors

null

Kazuaki Shibuya

Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

Kazuaki Shibuya , Hideki Kawamura , Yosuke Ohno , Nobuki Ichikawa , Tadashi Yoshida , Shigenori Homma , Akinobu Taketomi

Organizations

Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, Gastroeneterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan, Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan, Department of Gastoenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: To investigate the oncological feasibility and technical safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Methods: 186 advanced gastric cancer patients treated by gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were eligible for inclusion including those with invasion into the muscularis propria, subserosa, and serosa without involvement of other organs, and stages N0–2 and M0. We retrospectively compared the short- and-long term outcomes between laparoscopic gastrectomy and open gastrectomy. Results: We analyzed short-term outcomes by comparing distal- with total gastrectomy results. We found no significant difference for distal gastrectomy for postoperative morbidity (laparoscopic vs. open: n = 4 (4.6%) vs. n = 1 (3.6%); p= 1.00). We also found no significant difference in postoperative morbidity for total gastrectomy (laparoscopic vs. open: n = 2 (4.0%) vs. n = 1 (4.0%); p= 1.00). No deaths occurred in any group. The entire cohort analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in overall- or recurrence-free survival between the laparoscopic and open groups. For overall survival, there were no significant differences between open and laparoscopic groups for clinical stage II or III (p= 0.29 and 0.27, respectively), and for pathological stage II or III (p= 0.88 and 0.86, respectively). For recurrence-free survival, there were no significant differences between open and laparoscopic groups for clinical stage II or III (p= 0.63 and 0.60, respectively), and for pathological stage II or III (p = 0.98 and 0.72, respectively). Conclusions: Laparscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer compared favorably with open gastrectomy regarding short- and long-term outcomes. Clinical trial information: 160907.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Esophageal and Gastric Cancer and Other GI Cancers

Track

Esophageal and Gastric Cancer,Other GI Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

160907

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 4; abstr 369)

Abstract #

369

Poster Bd #

E2

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Jihong Bae

First Author: Masaru Komatsu

First Author: Chul Hyo Jeon