PHEREXA: A phase III study of trastuzumab (H) + capecitabine (X) ± pertuzumab (P) for patients (pts) who progressed during/after one line of H-based therapy in the HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) setting.

Authors

null

Ander Urruticoechea

Onkologikoa Foundation, San Sebastian, Spain

Ander Urruticoechea , Mohammed Rizwanullah , Seock-Ah Im , Antonio Carlos Sánchez-Ruiz , Istvan Lang , Gianluca Tomasello , Hannah Douthwaite , Tanja Badovinac Crnjevic , Sarah Heeson , Jennifer Eng-Wong , Montserrat Munoz

Organizations

Onkologikoa Foundation, San Sebastian, Spain, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary, SC Oncologia, Ospedale di Cremona, Cremona, Italy, Roche Products Limited, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, H. Clínic de Barcelona y Genómica Traslacional y Terapias Dirigidas en Tumores Sólidos, Barcelona, Spain

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: P provides a progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS) benefit in HER2-positive MBC, and is standard of care in the 1st line. Continuing H post-progression on 1st-line H improves response and time to progression. H + X is well tolerated and more effective than X in these pts, and dual P + H anti-HER2 therapy has activity in this population. However, efficacy and safety of P + H + X is unknown. We report the primary analysis of a multicenter, open-label randomized study of H + X vs P + H + X (NCT01026142). Methods: Pts who received a prior taxane and progressed during/after 1st-line H-based therapy for HER2-positive MBC were randomized to intravenous (IV) H 8 mg/kg then 6 mg/kg q3w + oral X 1250 mg/m2 twice daily (2 weeks on, 1 week off q3w; Arm A) or IV P 840 mg then 420 mg q3w + IV H per Arm A + oral X per Arm A but at 1000 mg/m2 (Arm B). The primary endpoint was independent review facility-assessed PFS (IRF PFS). The secondary endpoints of OS and safety are also reported. Hierarchical testing procedures were used to control type I error in the multiple statistical testing of IRF PFS and OS. Results: At clinical cutoff (5/29/15), 224 pts had been randomized to H + X and 228 to P + H + X (ITT populations; median follow-up 28.6 and 25.3 months, respectively). Baseline demographics/characteristics were generally balanced across arms. Median IRF PFS was 9.0 months in Arm A vs 11.1 months in Arm B (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65‒1.02; p = .0735). Interim OS was 28.1 months in Arm A vs 36.1 months in Arm B (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51‒0.90). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 214/218 pts (98.2%) in Arm A vs 222/228 (97.4%) in Arm B; grade ≥ 3 AEs in 130 (59.6%) vs 118 (51.8%), and treatment discontinuations due to AEs in 42 (19.3%) vs 48 (21.1%), respectively (safety populations). Conclusions: PHEREXA did not meet its primary endpoint of IRF PFS. An 8-month improvement in median OS with P to 36.1 months was observed. Statistical significance for OS cannot be claimed due to the hierarchical testing; however, the magnitude of benefit is in keeping with prior experience of P in MBC. No new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT01026142

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—HER2/ER

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

HER2+

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01026142

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 504)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.504

Abstract #

504

Abstract Disclosures