Does the choice of hormone therapy affect medium-term outcomes following radical external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer?

Authors

null

Ciara Lyons

Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom

Ciara Lyons , Jaine K. Blayney , Darren M. Mitchell , Jacqueline A. Harney , Jonathan McAleese , Lin Shum , David P. Stewart , Suneil Jain , Joe M. O'Sullivan

Organizations

Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom, Centre for Medical Bioinformatics, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast, United Kingdom, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the benefit of the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in the treatment of men with localized prostate cancer (PC). Anti-androgens (AA) may have a better toxicity profile than luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (LHRHa). However, no RCT has directly compared these agents in combination with radical EBRT. We evaluated outcomes for men with localized PC treated with EBRT in conjunction with either LHRHa or AA therapy. Methods: Data from 409 consecutive patients treated in NI with radical EBRT (70-74 Gy/2Gy #) between 2005 and 2009 were reviewed. Baseline and treatment characteristics analysed comprised age at diagnosis, T stage, initial PSA (iPSA), Gleason score, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (aCCI), ADT type and radiation dose. Outcomes included biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS; Phoenix), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) and overall survival (OS). Cox Proportional Hazards model was used for multivariate analysis (MVA). Results: Men receiving LHRHa were significantly more likely to be older and have a higher iPSA. On MVA, factors independently associated with biochemical failure were T stage ≥ 3 and use of AA (p < 0.004 and p < 0.02 respectively). On MVA, the single independent factor for poorer OS was higher aCCI (p < 0.000015). There was a trend towards poorer OS in the LHRHa group (p = 0.087). Conclusions: An aCCI > 4 was the only independent factor for poorer OS. While there was a significantly increased rate of biochemical failure in the AA group, there was a trend towards poorer OS in the LHRHa group. This study suggests that AA may be a reasonable alternative to LHRHa therapy in men with localized PC treated with radical EBRT and ADT.

Whole group
(N = 409)
AA
(N = 130)
LHRHa
(N = 279)
Risk grouping
    Low10 (2%)2 (1%)8 (3%)
    Intermediate108 (26%)49 (38%)59 (21%)
    High291 (71%)79 (61%)212 (76%)
Median follow-up (range) (months)75 (4 – 134)7176
bPFS60/409 (15%)25/130 (19%)35/279 (13%)
PCSS (insufficient events for further analysis)9/337 (3%)2/100 (2%)7/237 (3%)
OS54/409 (13%)10/130 (8%)44/279 (16%)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer,Prostate Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Localized Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 2S; abstr 97)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.97

Abstract #

97

Poster Bd #

E13

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Management outcomes of localized low-risk prostate cancer: A population-based study.

First Author: Shifeng S. Mao

First Author: Abdenour Nabid

First Author: Lawrence Ivan Karsh