Does the choice of hormone therapy affect medium-term outcomes following radical external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer?

Authors

null

Ciara Lyons

Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom

Ciara Lyons , Jaine K. Blayney , Darren M. Mitchell , Jacqueline A. Harney , Jonathan McAleese , Lin Shum , David P. Stewart , Suneil Jain , Joe M. O'Sullivan

Organizations

Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom, Centre for Medical Bioinformatics, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast, United Kingdom, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom, Queen's University School of Medicine / Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Other

Background: Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the benefit of the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in the treatment of localized prostate cancer (PC). Anti-androgens (AA) may have a better toxicity profile than luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (LHRHa). However, no RCT has directly compared these agents in combination with radical EBRT. We evaluated outcomes for men with localized PC treated with EBRT in conjunction with either LHRHa or AA therapy. Methods: Clinical data from 477 consecutive PC patients treated with radical EBRT (70-74 Gy) between 2005 and 2009 in Northern Ireland were reviewed. Detailed clinical information was obtained via an electronic medical record, a radiological results system and a pathological results database. Baseline and treatment characteristics analysed comprised age at diagnosis, clinical T stage, initial PSA, Gleason score, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (aCCI), ADT type and EBRT dose. Outcomes of interest included biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Complete data for 409 patients were available. At a median follow-up of 75 months, 5-year bPFS was 81%, PCSS was 98% and OS was 95% in the AA group and 92%, 98% and 88% respectively in the LHRHa group (p = 0.158 for the biochemical failure (BF) group and 0.25 for the OS group; insufficient events to assess PCSS). Men receiving LHRHa were significantly more likely to be older and have a higher iPSA. Conclusions: In this retrospective study, we found that an aCCI ≥ 4 was the only independent factor for poorer OS. While there was a significantly increased rate of BF in the AA group, there was a trend towards poorer OS in the LHRHa group. These data suggest that AA may be a reasonable alternative to LHRHa therapy in men with localized PC treated with radical EBRT and ADT.

MVAHRCIP-value
BF
    Clinical T Stage
        11
        21.210.58 – 2.530.61
        ≥ 32.691.38 – 5.270.004
    ADT Type
        AA1
        LHRHa0.530.31 – 0.900.02
OS
    aCCI
        0 – 21
        31.710.85 – 3.470.13
        ≥ 44.472.27 – 8.801.49e-05
    ADT Type
        AA1
        LHRHa1.830.9151-3.6810.09

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Genitourinary (Prostate) Cancer

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Sub Track

Epidemiology/Outcomes

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr e16588)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.e16588

Abstract #

e16588

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Management outcomes of localized low-risk prostate cancer: A population-based study.

First Author: Shifeng S. Mao

First Author: Abdenour Nabid

First Author: Lawrence Ivan Karsh