Genomic alterations in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) versus urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UBC).

Authors

null

Stephanie A. Mullane

Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA

Stephanie A. Mullane , Guillermo de Velasco , Toni K. Choueiri , Philip W. Kantoff , Joaquim Bellmunt

Organizations

Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Defining the landscape of genomic alterations in UTUC as well as identifying the genomic differences from UBC, may provide insights into the treatment of UTUC. Methods: We interrogated our enterprise-wide institutional targeted next generation tumor sequencing data to compare genomic alterations in patients with UTUC (n = 25) with UBC (n = 72), irrespective of tumor stage. We described differences in frequencies of somatic mutations and copy number alterations in 300 relevant cancer-associated genes. Results: UTUC and UBC demonstrated differences in somatic alterations. Genes more commonly found in UTUC included FGFR3 (20% v. 7.5%), STAG2 (16% v. 7.5%), RB1 (24% v. 16%), TSC1 (16% v. 5.4%), EP300 (12% v. 5.4%), IGFIR (20% v. 0%), and Notch1 (24% v. 0%) (see table). Alterations in FGFR3 and TP53 co-existed in only on patient. We did identify two UTUC patients with MSH2 alterations, both of whom had previously been diagnosed with Lynch Syndrome. Conclusions: Biologically relevant differences exist between UTUC and UBC. We observed an enrichment of potentially targetable mutations including TSC1 and FGFR3. Findings in the genomic profile underline the need to consider these two locations as unique entities for future biologically driven trials.

Genomic alterations.

UTUC (n = 25)UCB (n = 72)
EP3000.120.0538
CDKN2A0.160.151
RB10.240.151
FGFR30.20.075
STAG20.160.075
ERBB20.160.2
TSC10.160.054
TP530.560.52
CREBBP0.160.11
MLL20.60.42
MSH20.160
IGFIR0.20
NOTCH10.240

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Prostate Cancer; Urothelial Carcinoma; Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Prostate Cancer,Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Sub Track

Urothelial Carcinoma

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 2S; abstr 431)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.431

Abstract #

431

Poster Bd #

J2

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Michael Basin

First Author: Kit L. Yuen

Abstract

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

The genomic landscape of Chinese patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

First Author: Shengming Jin

First Author: Yuanlei Chen