Comparing the somatic, germline, and immune landscapes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and UC of the bladder (UCB).

Authors

null

Kit L. Yuen

University of California, San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA

Kit L. Yuen , Margaret F. Meagher , Jacob Mercer , Binyam Yilma , Melissa Conrad Stoppler , Stamatina Fragkogianni , Nataliya Mar , Arash Rezazadeh , Shilpa Gupta , Petros Grivas , Aditya Bagrodia , Rana R. McKay , Tyler F. Stewart , Amirali Salmasi

Organizations

University of California, San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, Tempus AI, Chicago, IL, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA

Research Funding

Tempus AI, Inc.

Background: Molecular characterization of anatomically distinct UCs has been limited by the rarity of UTUC; however, recent advances in real-world data curation have enabled larger UTUC cohort generation. Here, we investigated the somatic, germline, and immunologic landscapes of UTUC compared to UCB. Methods: From the Tempus Database, we retrospectively analyzed de-identified next-generation sequencing data from 505 UTUC (224 ureter, 281 renal pelvis) and 2,416 UCB cases (2,379 bladder, 37 urethra). Tumors were sequenced with the Tempus xT DNA and xR RNA assays. Pathogenic somatic mutations, immune cell infiltration predicted from gene expression patterns, TMB, PD-L1 from IHC, MSI, and mismatch repair (MMR) were evaluated. Incidental germline alterations were assessed in 46 genes for patients with tumor/normal-matched (T/N) sequencing (UTUC n=285, UCB n=1,359). Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to assess statistical significance (p<0.05, q<0.05 for false discovery rate correction for multiple testing). Results: Median age of the UTUC and UCB cohort were 73 and 70 years, respectively (p=0.003). The UCB cohort had significantly more males (75% vs 56%, p<0.001) and ever smokers (59% vs 46%, p<0.001).Alterations in TERT, TP53, CDK12, RB1, ERBB2, and CDKN1A were more frequent in UCB, while KMT2D, FGFR3, BRIP1, CDKN2B, KRAS, and MYC more frequent in UTUC (Table). Additionally, FGFR3 fusions were more frequent in UTUC. Germline variants were found in 7.1% of UCB and 7.0% of UTUC cases, with trends towards higher prevalence of alterations in lynch-associated genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) in UTUC (0.6% vs 1.8%, p=0.059). The prevalence of TMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb was higher in UCB vs UTUC (17% vs 11%, p<0.001). UCB had increased PD-L1 positivity (p=0.013), whereas UTUC had more MSI-high (UTUC = 3.2% vs UCB = 1%, p=0.001) and deficient MMR (p=0.020) cases. There were similar proportions of total immune infiltrates in UCB and UTUC. However, UTUC harbored a higher percentage of CD4+ T cells (p<0.001), while UCB had a higher proportion of regulatory T and NK cells (p<0.001). Conclusions: Via comprehensive molecular characterization of UC, we observed distinct DNA alteration and tumor microenvironment patterns in UTUC and UCB. The germline results underline how T/N testing can identify patients with UTUC and/or UCB who can benefit from dedicated germline testing. Further research is warranted to elucidate the clinical implications of these findings.


Molecular Characteristic
UCB
(n = 2,416)
UTUC
(n = 505)
TERT*76%52%
KMT2D*22%36%
RB1*22.0%8.9%
FGFR3*13%21%
CDK12*5.0%1.4%
TP53*59%51%
ERBB2*14.0%8.3%
FGFR3 fusions4.0%6.1%

*% mutated, q<0.05; p<0.05; p< 0.001; Analysis included short variants and copy number variants with the exception of FGFR3 fusions.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Sub Track

Biologic Correlates

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 16; abstr 4520)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.4520

Abstract #

4520

Poster Bd #

215

Abstract Disclosures