Clinical efficacy and safety profile of palbociclib (P) in combination with letrozole (L) as first-line treatment in patients (pts) with ER+ and HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) who have not received any systemic treatment (ST): A subgroup analysis of PALOMA-1/TRIO-18.

Authors

null

Richard S. Finn

University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

Richard S. Finn , John Crown , Johannes Ettl , Tamas Pinter , Anu Thummala , Yaroslav V. Shparyk , Ravi Patel , Sophia Randolph , Sindy Kim , Xin Huang , Yuqiu Jiang , Cynthia Huang Bartlett , Dennis J. Slamon

Organizations

University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, Irish Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany, Petz Aladar Megyei Oktato Korhaz, Gyor, Hungary, Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, Lviv State Oncologic Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Center, Lviv, Ukraine, Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center, Bakersfield, CA, Pfizer Oncology, La Jolla, CA, Pfizer Oncology, New York, NY, School of Medicine/Translational Oncology Research Laboratory, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: P is an orally active inhibitor of CDK4/6. In a randomized phase II study, P + L significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs L alone (20 vs 10 mo; HR = 0.488, P =0.0004; Finn et al, Lancet Oncol, 2015) in ER+/HER2- ABC as first-line treatment. Given that pts who did not receive any systemic treatment (ST) may have different disease biology/course from those treated and relapsed from early stage disease and many pts may initiate endocrine therapy (ET) alone, we investigated the benefit of P + L in this subgroup in the PALOMA-1/TRIO-18 study. Methods: 165 ER+ and HER2- postmenopausal pts who are treatment naïve for their ABC were randomized to receive L (N = 81) or P+L (N = 84). A subset of pts did not receive any ST in the adjuvant setting prior to randomization (P+L n = 44, L n = 37). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. Tumor assessment was performed every 8 weeks. Tumor tissues were collected for correlative biomarkers. Results: Clinical characteristics at baseline were well balanced on median age (P+L vs. L: 63 vs 62), ECOG PS (0/1 59%/41% vs. 49%/51%) and site of disease (visceral/bone only/other: 55%/14%/32% vs. 51%/14%/35%). Observed mPFS was 24 m (95% CI 13, 35) for P+ L vs. 8 m for L (95% CI 6, 13) with HR = 0.315 (95% CI 0.175-0.566) (p < 0.0001). Overall response rate (ORR) was 48% (95% CI 33%, 63%) vs. 41% (25%, 58%); clinical benefit rate (PR+SD ≥ 24 wks) was 84% (70%, 93%) vs. 70% (53%, 84%). The most common treatment emerged adverse events (all grades) for P + L arm were neutropenia (67%), fatigue (49%), leucopenia (49%), and anemia (35%), consistent with the overall safety profile. Tissue samples were available in 73 pts. Loss of RB expression by immunohistochemistry was rare (5.4%). Ki67 baseline did not predict response. Conclusions: The addition of P to L increased by > 2 the PFS in pts who did not receive ST for their ER+ MBC. The most common AEs are manageable. Favorable risk benefit profile suggests P+L be considered for this group of pts. Clinical trial information: NCT00721409

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—HER2/ER

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

ER+

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00721409

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 575)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.575

Abstract #

575

Poster Bd #

63

Abstract Disclosures