Comparative effectiveness of first-line (1st) VEGF TKI followed by second-line (2nd) therapy with either a VEGF TKI or an mTOR inhibitor in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Authors

null

Shiven B. Patel

Huntsman Cancer Inst, Salt Lake City, UT

Shiven B. Patel , David D. Stenehjem , JoAnn Hsu , Srinivas Kiran Tantravahi , David Gill , Archana M. Agarwal , Julia A. Batten , Neeraj Agarwal , Sumanta Kumar Pal

Organizations

Huntsman Cancer Inst, Salt Lake City, UT, Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Inst, Salt Lake City, UT, University of Utah Health Care, Salt Lake City, UT, Department of Pathology and ARUP Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: In the INTORSECT trial, not progression-free (PFS), but overall survival (OS) was higher with sorafenib vs. temsirolimus in 2nd setting after 1st sunitinib therapy in mRCC pts. Here, we compare the PFS and OS between any VEGF TKI and mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) in 2nd setting in mRCC after progression on 1st VEGF TKI. Methods: Pts were identified from two institutional databases. Survival estimates of PFS and OS were assessed from initiation of 2nd therapy by Kaplan-Meier methodology and stratified by the median PFS of the 1st therapy. Results: Of 125 pts treated with a 1st VEGFR-TKI, 46 received a 2nd VEGFR-TKI (37%) and 79 received a 2nd mTORi (63%). Baseline variables such as age, race, gender, histology, MSKCC and IMDC criteria did not differ by 2nd therapy (Table). Table presents survival estimates in months (mos) by 2nd therapy. Conclusions: Improved PFS (7.4 vs 4.5 mos, p= 0.026), and a trend for improved OS was observed with 2nd line VEGFR TKI vs mTORi. Improved PFS was more pronounced with 2nd VEGFR TKI if 1stVEFGR TKI usage >8 mos (11.3 vs 5.1 mos, p=0.009), suggesting continued VEGF inhibition may be a pertinent strategy in this subset of patients.

VEGFR-TKI (n=46)mTORi
(n=79)
P-value
Survival from 2nd tx, mos
Median OS26.915.40.053
1st VEGFR-TKI ≥8 mos28.624.20.700
1st VEGFR-TKI <8 mos22.17.00.058
Median PFS7.44.50.026
1st VEGFR-TKI ≥8 mos11.35.10.009
1st VEGFR-TKI <8 mos5.53.70.461
Age, y (%)
Median (IQR)58 (52-66)60 (53-69)0.085
Gender, n (%)
Male28 (61)60 (76)0.077
Race, n (%)
White40 (87)62 (78)0.408
Hispanic4 (9)9 (11)
Other2 (4)8 (10)
Histology subtype, n (%)
Clear cell35 (76)65 (82)0.221
Papillary7 (15)7 (6)
Chromophobe3 (7)3 (4)
Other1 (2)6 (8)
MSKCC, n (%)
Favorable11 (34)26 (36)0.263
Intermediate21 (66)40 (56)
Poor0 (0)6 (8)
IMDC, n (%)
Favorable0 (0)4 (5)0.079
Intermediate25 (78)41 (56)
Poor7 (22)28 (38)
1st VEGFR-TKI, n (%)
Sunitinib33 (72)75 (95)
Sorafenib10 (22)2 (3)
Pazopanib3 (7)2 (3)
2nd line, n (%)
Pazopanib13 (28)-
Sorafenib16 (35)-
Axitinib4 (9)-
Sunitinib12 (26)-
Cabozantinib1 (2)-
Temsirolimus-30 (38)
Everolimus-49 (62)

*SBP and DDS: Equal contribution.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Genitourinary (Nonprostate) Cancer

Track

Genitourinary Cancer

Sub Track

Kidney Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr e15589)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e15589

Abstract #

e15589

Abstract Disclosures