A single-arm, open-label, phase II study to evaluate the safety of vemurafenib (VEM) followed by ipilimumab (IPI) in BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma (MM).

Authors

null

Asim Amin

Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, NC

Asim Amin , David H. Lawson , April K. Salama , Henry B. Koon , Troy H. Guthrie , Sajeve Samuel Thomas , Steven O'Day , Montaser F. Shaheen , Bin Zhang , Stephen Francis , F. Stephen Hodi

Organizations

Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, NC, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, Baptist Cancer Institute, Jacksonville, FL, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando, Orlando, FL, Los Angeles Skin Cancer Institute at Beverly Hills Cancer Center, Beverly Hills, CA, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, NJ, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Braine-l’Alleud, Belgium, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: There is much interest in determining how to incorporate BRAF inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of patients (pts) with BRAF-mutant MM. A phase I study showed that concurrent administration of IPI, an antibody that blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, and VEM, an inhibitor of BRAF V600-mutated kinase, caused significant dose-limiting hepatotoxicity in BRAF-mutant MM pts. An alternate strategy is to use these agents sequentially in order to minimize toxicities observed with concurrent administration and to improve efficacy over either agent alone. Methods: This single-arm, open-label, phase II study evaluated the safety of VEM followed by IPI in treatment-naïve MM pts harboring a BRAF V600 mutation. Pts initially received VEM for 6 weeks (960 mg twice daily) followed by IPI at 10 mg/kg (Q3W x 4 doses, then Q12W beginning at week 24 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity) [VEM1-IPI phase]; VEM was then restarted. The primary objective was to estimate the incidence of grade 3–4 drug-related skin adverse events (AEs) during the VEM1-IPI phase. Results: Among 46 pts treated in the VEM1-IPI phase, 80% were male, 52% had stage M1c, and 54% had ≥ 5 sites involved. Grade 3–4 drug-related skin AEs occurred in 15 (33%) pts during the VEM1-IPI phase, the most common of which was rash in 9 (20%) pts. Grade 3–4 drug-related gastrointestinal AEs occurred in 10 (22%) pts (diarrhea in 5 [11%]) and hepatobiliary AEs in 2 (4%) pts (hepatitis; hyperbilirubinemia). There were no deaths due to study drug toxicity. At a median follow-up of 10.5 mo, the objective response rate was 30% (95% CI, 18%–46%) during the VEM1-IPI phase. Median progression-free survival was 4.4 mo (95% CI, 4.2–5.9). Interim median overall survival was 20.3 mo (95% CI, 11.1–NE). Conclusions: VEM followed by IPI at 10 mg/kg has a manageable safety profile with no significant signals of hepatobiliary toxicity, as seen with concurrent VEM and IPI; the incidence of grade 3–4 skin AEs was higher than with either agent alone. The benefit/risk of this sequence needs to be evaluated further based on individual patient characteristics and new treatment options. Clinical trial information: NCT01673854

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2015 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01673854

Citation

J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 9032)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.9032

Abstract #

9032

Poster Bd #

275

Abstract Disclosures