Peripheral neuropathy (PN) in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer treated with eribulin: Resolution and association with efficacy.

Authors

null

Peter Kaufman

Norris Cotton Cancer Center and Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH

Peter Kaufman , Martin Olivo , Yi He , Susan McCutcheon , Linda Vahdat

Organizations

Norris Cotton Cancer Center and Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, Eisai Inc., Hatfield, United Kingdom, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: PN is a known adverse effect of various antimicrotubule agents, including eribulin. We report here the incidence and resolution of PN in breast cancer pts treated with eribulin in completed phase 2 and 3 studies, and the efficacy of eribulin in pts with PN in the phase 3 EMBRACE and 301 studies. Methods: In EMBRACE, women had received 2-5 lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease. In this ≥ 3rd-line setting, pts randomized to eribulin mesylate received it at 1.4 mg/m2 iv, days 1 and 8 every 21 days. The dosing schedule was the same in study 301, which involved pts who had received 0-2 prior chemotherapies for advanced disease. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed by stratified log-rank test. Data from EMBRACE and 301 were pooled with data from 2 phase 2 studies to assess time to improvement (a decrease of ≥ 1 grade) and resolution (decrease in grade to 0, 1 or baseline) of grade 3 or 4 PN. Results: In the pooled safety analysis, 7.7% (116/1503) of pts treated with eribulin had grade 3 or 4 PN; 63.8% of these experienced improvement in PN and 50% had resolution. Median time to improvement was 2.1 weeks and to resolution was 7.7 weeks. Characteristics were similar in pts with or without PN in EMBRACE and 301. Those with PN had longer exposure to eribulin vs pts without PN (median exposure [months], study 301: 4.9 vs 3.2; EMBRACE: 4.8 vs 2.9). OS and PFS were significantly longer in pts with PN (Table). Conclusions: Pts who had a favourable therapeutic response to eribulin, received a longer course of treatment and thus had a greater risk of PN. Severity of PN improved in most pts within a short period. Regarding PN, the risk–benefit ratio for eribulin supports treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT00337103, NCT00388726.

Study 301
EMBRACE
PN
(n = 149)
No PN
(n = 405)
PN
(n = 210)
No PN
(n = 298)
Eribulin exposure (median cycles) 7.0 4.0 7.0 4.0
OS, median (months) 21.8 15.2 15.3 11.0
hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.68 (0.55, 0.85) 0.62 (0.49, 0.79)
P value < 0.001 < 0.001
PFS, median (months)* 6.1 3.3 5.3 2.5
hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.60 (0.48, 0.77) 0.54 (0.43, 0.66)
P value < 0.001 < 0.001

*Based on independent review committee assessment. Hazard ratio for PN vs no PN.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 Breast Cancer Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session B: Risk Assessment, Prevention, Early Detection,  Screening, and Systemic Therapy

Track

Systemic Therapy,Risk Assessment, Prevention, Early Detection, and Screening

Sub Track

Advanced Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00337103, NCT00388726

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 26; abstr 147)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.26_suppl.147

Abstract #

147

Poster Bd #

D19

Abstract Disclosures