MGMT immunohistochemistry (IHC) and exclusion of pancreatic NET (PanNET) patients from treatment with temozolomide-based therapy.

Authors

null

Diane Lauren Reidy

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

Diane Lauren Reidy , Olca Basturk , Anuja Kriplani , Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa , William R. Jarnagin , Peter J. Allen , Leonard Saltz , David S. Klimstra , Liying Zhang

Organizations

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Predictive markers are needed for improved selection of patients for Capecitabine/Temozolomide (C/T) therapy in metastatic PanNETs. Treatment efficacy has been reported to correlate with tumor O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) deficiency. Based on these data, retained MGMT expression by IHC has been proposed as an exclusionary marker. However, a marker would only be clinically useful if it is able to identify patients so unlikely to benefit that treatment would be inappropriate. We conducted a retrospective analysis to assess MGMT expression in PanNETs and to correlate this with the efficacy of C/T. Methods: Using an institutional electronic pharmacy database, we identified patients with PanNETs with tissue available treated with C/T from 1/2003-10/2013. Expression of MGMT protein was assessed by IHC on primary tumors or metastases. Immunolabeling in ≥5% of tumor nuclei was defined as “positive” staining (retained expression) of MGMT protein. When possible, pyrosequencing to detect the level of methylation in 5 CpG sites in exon 1 of the MGMT gene, was used to evaluate MGMT promoter hypermethylation in the tumor. Results: Thirteen patients (mean age, 57) were identified; 3 (23%) low grade, 8 (61%) intermediate grade, 2 (15%) high grade. 4/13 (31%) patients with evidence of tumor shrinkage had MGMT IHC positive tumors. Of these, 1 patient (promoter hypermethylation absent) had unresectable disease rendered resectable after a significant response to C/T and is now 2 years free of disease. Tissue was unavailable to test for promoter hypermethylation in the remaining 3 patients. Of the 9 patients where MGMT by IHC was absent, all 9 had evidence of tumor shrinkage (100%). Tumor burden (0%, <10%, 10-50%, >50%), number of prior systemic treatments, and tumor grade did not correlate with tumor shrinkage. Conclusions: In this study, absence of MGMT expression correlated with response, however 30% of MGMT positive tumors responded. More discriminant markers are required. The possibility that hypermethylation of MGMT gene is a predictor is being explored in ongoing studies.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Neuroendocrine/Carcinoid

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl; abstr e15169)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.e15169

Abstract #

e15169

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Eduardo Terán Brage Sr.

First Author: Heloisa P. Soares

First Author: Jonathan R. Strosberg