A randomized study of temozolomide or temozolomide and capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Final analysis of efficacy and evaluation of MGMT (ECOG-ACRIN E2211).

Authors

Pamela Kunz

Pamela L. Kunz

Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Pamela L. Kunz , Noah Graham , Paul J. Catalano , Halla Nimeiri , George A. Fisher Jr., Teri A. Longacre , Carlos J. Suarez , Daniel Rubin , James C. Yao , Matthew H. Kulke , Andrew Eugene Hendifar , James Christopher Shanks , Manisha H. Shah , Mark Zalupski , Edmond L. Schmulbach , Diane Lauren Reidy , Jonathan R. Strosberg , Terence Z. Wong , Peter J. O'Dwyer , Al Bowen Benson III

Organizations

Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, Health East Cancer Care, Lake Elmo, MN, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, The Permanente Medical Group, South San Francisco, CA, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health

Background: Patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have few treatment options that yield objective tumor response. Retrospective and small, prospective studies suggest that the combination of capecitabine and temozolomide is associated with high response rates (RR) and relative long progression-free survival (PFS). This trial was conducted to establish a role for the combination of capecitabine and temozolomide. Methods: E2211 was a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial comparing temozolomide (200 mg/m2 PO QD days 1-5) vs. capecitabine/temozolomide (capecitabine 750 mg/m2 PO BID days 1-14; temozolomide 200 mg/m2 PO QD days 10-14) in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs. Eligibility criteria included: metastatic or unresectable, low or intermediate grade pancreatic NETs, progression within preceding 12 months, and no prior temozolomide, DTIC, capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were Overall Survival (OS), RR, safety, and MGMT as evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and promoter methylation. Allowing for 5% ineligibility, 145 randomized patients were required to obtain 138 eligible patients to detect a difference in median PFS of 9 versus 14 months (hazard ratio of 0.64) using a two-sided log-rank test at the overall 0.20 significance level with 81% power. Results: 144 patients were enrolled between 4/2013 to 3/2016 to temozolomide (n = 72) or capecitabine/temozolomide (n = 72); the efficacy analysis population included 133 eligible patients. At the scheduled interim analysis in January 2018, median PFS was 14.4 months for temozolomide vs. 22.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (HR = 0.58), which was sufficient to reject the null hypothesis for this final primary endpoint (stratified log rank p = 0.022. In the final analysis (5/2021), median OS was 53.8 months for temozolomide and 58.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (HR = 0.82, p = 0.42) and RR was 34% for temozolomide and 40% for capecitabine/temozolomide (p = 0.59). Capecitabine/temozolomide was associated with higher rates of grade 3-4 AEs (45% vs. 22%, p = 0.005). MGMT deficiency, defined as either low IHC or positive promoter methylation, was associated with greater odds of response (OR [95% CI] = 6.38 [2.19, 18.60] and 9.79 [1.09, 87.71], respectively). Conclusions: E2211 is the first prospective randomized trial of capecitabine/temozolomide and shows the longest PFS and highest RR reported for patients with pancreatic NETs in a prospective randomized study. MGMT deficiency was associated with greater odds of objective response. Clinical trial information: NCT01824875.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Neuroendocrine/Carcinoid

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01824875

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 4004)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.4004

Abstract #

4004

Abstract Disclosures