Randomized phase II study of axitinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors

Bart Neyns

Bart Neyns

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussels, Brussels, Belgium

Bart Neyns , Johnny Duerinck , Stephanie Du Four , Frank Bouttens , Vincent Verschaeve , Hendrik Everaert , An Van Binst

Organizations

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussels, Brussels, Belgium, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, AZ Sint-Lucas Gent, Ghent, Belgium, GHDC, Charleroi, Belgium

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) signal transduction mediates glioblastoma (GB) associated neo-angiogenesis. Axitinib is an oral small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor with high affinity and specificity for the VEGF-receptors, approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Methods: Axitinib (5 mg BID starting dose) vs. best alternative choice of therapy was studied in an open label, randomized, phase II clinical trial in patients (pts) with recurrent GB. Six-month progression-free survival (6mPFS) was the primary endpoint. Results: Between Sep 2011 and Oct 2013, 44 pts who failed surgery, RT and temozolomide were randomized 1:1 at 3 sites. Median age 54y (range 20-79), 33M/11F, WHO-PS 0/1/2/3: 6, 26, 11, and 1 pt. In the control arm 20 pts received bevacizumab and 2 pts received lomustine at standard doses. Axitinib (n=22) was generally well tolerated. Most common axitinib related AEs consisted of dysphonia (3x G2), fatigue (6x G2, 2x G3), hypertension (5x G2), oral hyperesthesia (7x G2, 1x G3), diarrhea (2x G2, 2x G3), and hypothyroidism (3x G2). In 4 pts axitinib dosing was interrupted and subsequently dose reduced because of toxicity; in 4 other pts axitinib was dose escalated to 7 or 10 mg BID (2 pts each). Tumor response by RANO criteria was 28% in the axitinib arm vs. 23% in the control arm (Table). All pts had an increased uptake on 18F-FET PET at baseline. A decrease (-26 to -100%) of SUVmax/background was documented in 6/7 pts on axitinib at the time of response on MRI. Corticosteroids could be stopped in 4/12 and tapered in an additional 5/12 pts in the axitinib arm. After a median follow-up of 10.5 mths, the 6mPFS for axitinib was 22% (95% CI 5-40) vs. 19% (95% CI 2-36) for the control arm. Median PFS and OS were respectively 2.9 vs. 2.6 mths, and 10.3 vs. 7.4 mths for pts treated in the axitinib vs. control arm. Conclusions: Axitinib has single-agent activity and manageable toxicity in pts with recurrent GB. The survival on the axitinib arm was comparable to that on the contemporary control arm. Further evaluation of axitinib for recurrent GB is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01562197.

Axitinib
Control
BOR Confirmed
BOR
BOR Confirmed
BOR
CR 5 2 1 1
PR 6 4 5 4
SD 5 7
PD 5 8
NE 1 1

Abbreviations: BOR, best overall tumor response; NE: not evaluable.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Highlights Session

Session Title

Central Nervous System Tumors

Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Sub Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01562197

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 2018)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.2018

Abstract #

2018

Poster Bd #

8

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Megan Mantica

First Author: Shiao-Pei S. Weathers

First Author: Samuel Aaron Goldlust

First Author: Yazmin Odia