Ombipepimut dosing emulsion (ODE) + bevacizumab (bev) vs bev alone in patients (pts) with recurrent or progressive glioblastoma (rGBM).

Authors

null

Samuel Aaron Goldlust

John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ

Samuel Aaron Goldlust , Jong Hee Chang , Yoshitaka Narita , Mary Roberta Welch , Richard M. Green , Jan Drappatz , David Eric Piccioni , Yu Jung Kim , Jason M. Melear , Shota Tanaka , Kuo-Chen Wei , Karen L. Fink , Marshall W. Pitz , Timothy Francis Cloughesy , John Frederick de Groot , Nanci McClellan , Matthew Hitron , Bo Xu , Bo Jin , Claudia Lebedinsky

Organizations

John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea, Texas Oncology PA, Austin, TX, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-Ku, Japan, New Taipei Muncipal TuChneg Hopsital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, Sumitomo Pharma Oncology, Marlborough, MA, 84 Waterford Drive, Marlborough, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Sumitomo Pharma Oncology

Background: ODE is an investigational cancer vaccine derived from Wilms tumor 1. WIZARD was a randomized, adaptive, phase 3 study to test ODE + bev vs bev in rGBM pts (NCT03149003). Patients were stratified prior to randomization based upon KPS [60 or 70] vs [80 to 100] and extent of resection at initial diagnosis. Patients with low KPS (e.g., 60) are generally underrepresented in clinical trials. Methods: Pts ≥18 years with GBM at first recurrence were enrolled. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint; the key secondary endpoint was the 12-month OS rate. The primary and the key secondary endpoints were tested using 1-sided test with an overall significance level 2.5%. The Lan-DeMets error spending function based upon O’Brien-Fleming stopping boundaries was used to adjust the significance level for the interim and final analyses. Results: From April 2018 to Aug 2021, 217 pts were randomized 1:1; 109 to ODE + bev and 108 to bev. OS was analyzed after 185 events with a median follow-up of 31.8 months (mo). Pts at baseline had a median age of 60 years, 45.2% reported corticosteroid use, 29% had KPS 60 or 70, 7.8% had tumors that harbored IDH1 or 2 mutations, and the median tumor volume was 10,532 mm3. Baseline characteristics between treatment arms were balanced in the ITT and KPS subgroups. Pts with KPS 60 or 70 had more corticosteroid use, worse NANO scores, and larger tumor burden than those with KPS 80-100. The study did not meet its primary endpoint of OS by ITT (ODE + bev: 10.2 mo vs bev: 9.4 mo, 1-sided p-value: 0.2159). Pts with KPS 60 or 70 had longer OS when treated with ODE + bev (8.2 vs 6.3 mo, 45% death risk reduction, 1-side p value: 0.0119). Grade 1 or 2 injection site reaction was the most common TEAE in the ODE + bev arm. No clinically significant difference in safety was noted between KPS subgroups. Conclusions: The data in pts with KPS 60 or 70 suggested benefit with ODE + bev that was consistent across different endpoints and that warrants further validation. Clinical trial information: NCT03149003.

Efficacy outcomes by KPS subgroup (ITT population).

Endpoints KPS 60 or 70
ODE +Bev
(N = 32)
KPS 60 or 70
Bev
(N = 31)
KPS 80-100
ODE +Bev
(N = 77)
KPS 80-100
Bev
(N = 77)
mOS (mo), 95% CI 8.2(4.3,10.5) 6.3 (4.1,7.4) HR: 0.545
(0.319, 0.930)
10.6 (8.5,12.8) 10.6 (9.4,12.8) HR: 1.117
(0.787, 1.586)
12 mo OS rate (%) 29.5 12.9 Diff: 16.6
(-3.3, 36.6)
41.3 39.5 Diff: 1.9
(-14.0, 17.7)
mOS excluding IDH1 or 2, 95% CI 8.2 (5.8, 1.10) 6.3 (4.1, 7.4) HR: 0.523
(0.301, 0.908)
9.8(7.9,11.7) 10.6(9.4,12.8) HR: 1.279
(0.882,1.854)
mPFS (mo), 95% CI 4.8 (3.5, 8.1) 2.9 (1.9, 3.7) HR: 0.542
(0.308, 0.953)
5.3 (3.9, 5.6) 5.5 (3.7, 8.5) HR: 1.299
(0.829, 2.037
ORR % (n/N) 21.9 (7/32) 12.9 (4/31) 20.8 (16/77) 13.0 (10/77)
DCR % (n/N) 78.1 (25/32) 45.2 (14/31) 80.5(62/77) 50.6(39/77)
Without neurological
progression at 6 mo (%)
56 28 69 65

Progression free survival: PFS; overall response rate: ORR; disease control rate: DCR using mRANO by central review.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Central Nervous System Tumors

Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Sub Track

Primary CNS Tumors–Glioma

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03149003

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 2022)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.2022

Abstract #

2022

Poster Bd #

379

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Joshua Nahm

First Author: Manik Chahal

Abstract

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Dose-dependent efficacy of bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma.

First Author: Jawad Melhem