Background: Although both the SHARP and the Asian-Pacific trials showed improved OS for sorafenib when compared to placebo, the magnitude of benefit was substantially less for Asian pts, who have a higher prevalence of hepatitis B (HBV) infection. Whether the worse prognosis is related to ethnicity or to the etiology of HCC remains unclear. BC has a sizeable Asian population that can provide a good comparison to Caucasian pts with HCC. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors among pts with HCC who received sorafenib. Methods: 257 consecutive pts with advanced HCC who initiated sorafenib from January 2008 to February 2013 were identified using our pharmacy database. Clinicopathological variables and outcomes were retrospectively collected. Prognostic factors were assessed by univariate (Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests) and multivariate analyses (Cox proportional hazards models). Results: Median age was 62 years (range 22-93), 80.5% were men, and 37.7% were Asian. Among them, 34.2% had HBV and 29.6% had hepatitis C (HCV). In addition, 68.4% had cirrhosis and 46.3% had liver-limited disease. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months (95% CI 3.2-4.1). Median OS from initiation of sorafenib to death was 7.4 months (95% CI 5.7-9.1). On univariate analysis, good ECOG PS, AFP < 250 and history of HCV were associated with better OS (p < 0.001, 0.002 and 0.025, respectively). Ethnicity, age, gender, HBV, cirrhosis and extra-hepatic metastases were not significantly associated with OS. On multivariate analysis, good ECOG PS, AFP < 250 and HCV positivity correlated with better OS (p < 0.001, 0.001 and 0.006, respectively), while ethnicity did not. Conclusions: When treated with sorafenib at the same institution, Asians and Caucasians with advanced HCC had similar OS. ECOG PS, AFP and HCV were the only significant prognostic factors. A higher proportion of HCVpositivity might explain why the SHARP trial achieved better OS when compared to the Asian-Pacific trial.