Improving quality and safety of oncology patient care: Standardization of the post-clinic message triage process.

Authors

null

Caitlin C. Donohue

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Caitlin C. Donohue, Marina Kaymakcalan, Aymen Elfiky, Carole Kathleen Dalby, Julie M. Bryar, Joseph O. Jacobson

Organizations

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Due to the rapidly increasing complexity of the treatment and management landscape of genitourinary oncology patients,the high volume of patient calls within our practice has raised safety concerns among providers about follow-through on issues and coordination of care. Survey data revealed that more than 20% of providers and staff (n=19) were unsatisfied with the existing message triage process and indicated that it was not the most efficient and timely way to respond to clinical messages. Patient survey data (n=94) and analysis of messages showed 80% of messages were related to direct patient care issues. The aim of this project was to analyze and streamline the message triage process with the goal of creating a standardized approach to respond to clinical messages in a timely and efficient manner. Methods: A multidisciplinary team constructed a process map, administered surveys, conducted cause-and-effect analyses, orchestrated brainstorming sessions, and used a priority/pay-off matrix to devise and implement an intervention using a standardized message template. Results: Baseline data showed that 18% of emails contained the necessary components to provide direction on who held responsibility for answering a message. Three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were conducted: (1) Education provided to administrative staff; (2) Implementation of email template; and (3) Subsequent modification in response to PDSA 2. After 3 weeks, 85% of emails contained the necessary components. Compared to a baseline of 79%, 96% of providers and staff prefer the new process. Conclusions: The interventions implemented using three sequential PDSA cycles resulted in an improved process for triaging clinical calls in conjunction with enhancing provider satisfaction. Additional steps are planned to further standardize the email notification template.

Date Total # emails % Emails with all components
Baseline
Day 1 8 25%
Day 2 9 11%
Day 3 11 18%
Mean 9 18%
PDSA 1
Day 4 11 45%
Mean 11 46%
PDSA 2
Day 5 19 79%
Day 6 18 94%
Day 7 19 100%
Day 8 20 85%
Day 9 31 90%
Mean 21 90%
PDSA 3
Day 10 31 84%
Day 11 22 100%
Day 12 15 73%
Day 13 11 82%
Mean 20 85%

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session B: Practice of Quality and Health Reform

Track

Practice of Quality,Health Reform: Implications for Costs and Quality

Sub Track

Learning from Projects Done in a Practice

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl 31; abstr 163)

Abstract #

163

Poster Bd #

B8

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Multidisciplinary education and action to foster equitable cancer care.

First Author: Monica Augustyniak

First Author: Ravi Salgia

First Author: John M. Kirkwood