Improving care for patients with stage III/IV NSCLC: Learnings for multidisciplinary teams from the ACCC national quality survey.

Authors

null

Ravi Salgia

The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Ravi Salgia , Leigh Boehmer , Catherine Celestin , Judy Yu , David R. Spigel

Organizations

The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, Association of Community Cancer Centers, Rockville, MD, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
AstraZeneca

Background: Refinement of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach continues to offer significant potential for improving the quality of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) care and adherence to guideline-recommended protocols. This opportunity arises, in part, from insufficient characterization of MDT practice patterns and barriers to optimal care provision within U.S. cancer programs. The Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC), therefore, conducted a national survey to improve understanding on how patients with stage III/IV NSCLC were diagnosed and managed across different practice settings, with the aim of informing the design and execution of process-improvement plans to address identified barriers. Methods: ACCC convened an expert steering committee of multidisciplinary specialists, including oncologists, thoracic surgeons, pathologists, pulmonologists, and representation from patient advocacy, for a comprehensive, double-blind, web-based survey (January–April 2019), to obtain insights on cancer patient care in a diverse set of U.S. community cancer programs. Results: Of 1211 questionnaires, 639 responses affiliated to 160 unique cancer programs across 44 U.S. states were suitable for analysis. In total, 41% (n = 261) of respondents indicated that their cancer program did not have a thoracic multidisciplinary clinic. The average time to first therapeutic intervention in newly diagnosed patients was 4 weeks (range = 1–10 weeks; n = 298). A significant negative correlation between frequency of tumor board meetings and time to complete disease staging (r = −0.13, P = 0.03) was observed. Nurse navigators (P = 0.03) and radiation oncologists (P = 0.04) were significantly more likely to engage in shared decision-making practices than other disciplines. The most challenging barriers to delivering high-quality NSCLC care are listed (Table). Conclusions: Multiple opportunities exist to improve the delivery and quality of care for patients with stage III/IV NSCLC, including lowering barriers to effective screening, diagnosis, and care coordination and adhering to evolving standards of care.

Key barriers to delivering quality NSCLC care.

ScreeningDiagnosisCare Coordination
Lack of community awarenessLimited access to diagnostic proceduresLack of patient adherence to appointment schedule
Lack of patient interestPatient refusals to undergo biopsyMisinterpretation of biomarker results
TransportationPoor handling of biopsy samplesLack of communication amongst the MDT

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Health Services Research and Quality Improvement

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Quality Improvement

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr e19195)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.e19195

Abstract #

e19195

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Mark A. Socinski

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Quality of colorectal and anal cancer care delivered during the COVID pandemic.

First Author: Melanie Lynn Powis

First Author: George Therapondos