DtectDx Breast: A serum biomarker test for breast cancer detection used in conjunction with traditional mammography screening.

Authors

null

Meredith C. Henderson

Provista Diagnostics, Scottsdale, AZ

Meredith C. Henderson , Keri Sweeten , Sherri Borman , Christa Corn , Lindsey Gordon , David E. Reese

Organizations

Provista Diagnostics, Scottsdale, AZ, Provista Diagnostics, Phoenix, AZ

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Provista Diagnostics has developed a test that analyzes serum concentrations of 5 protein biomarkers in order to detect breast cancer. The dtectDx Breast test utilizes a proprietary algorithm that has been described previously (Weber et al. 2010). In this study, it was noted that the algorithm performs best in women under age 50. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of dtectDx Breast in women under age 50 in a commercial setting and compare the results with data from the previous clinical study. Methods: The dtectDx Breast test measures the concentrations of IL-8, IL-12, VEGF, CEA, and HGF via ELISA. These data combined with select patient characteristics and Provista’s proprietary algorithm result in a test value that is characterized as normal or elevated. dtectDx Breast test reports issued for women under age 50 were reviewed from a 3-year time period and prescribing physicians were interviewed regarding follow-up care and outcome measures (largely imaging studies, if warranted). Results: Of the 908 patients, 8 samples were rejected based on serum quality. Of the remaining 900 patients, 121 were reported as elevated (12.7%). In 4 cases, these elevated results were confirmed cases of breast cancer. Of these, 2 patients initially showed no screening evidence of cancer, but upon further evaluation (after receipt of dtectDx Breast results) were diagnosed with breast cancer. dtectDx correctly identified DCIS 66% of the time (n=2). Conclusions: These results describe the use of dtectDx Breast in a clinical setting and confirm that the assay behaves similarly to previously published results (Weber et al 2010). While the false-positive rate is higher than predicted (12.7% vs 6.8%), the assay correctly identified 4 of 4 invasive cancers and 2 of 3 DCIS cases. Since two of the invasive cancer cases were originally not detected via standard screening procedures, the assay has demonstrated important clinical utility when used in conjunction with mammography/standard of care. Here we show that, in the commercial patient population, when combined with standard of care, dtectDx Breast improves the detection of breast cancer in women under 50.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 Breast Cancer Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session A

Track

Local/Regional Therapy,Risk Assessment, Prevention, Detection, and Screening

Sub Track

General Screening

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl 26; abstr 18)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.26_suppl.18

Abstract #

18

Poster Bd #

B17

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts