Impact of early tumor shrinkage on clinical outcome in KRAS wild-type colorectal liver-limited metastases treated with cetuximab plus chemotherapy: Lessons from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors

null

Le-chi Ye

Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan, Shanghai, China

Le-chi Ye , Yunshi Zhong , Tianshu Liu , Ye Wei , Li Ren , Dexiang Zhu , Xinyu Qin , Jia Fan , Jingwen Chen , Wenju Chang , Qi Lin , Jianmin Xu

Organizations

Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan, Shanghai, China, Institute of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, Department of General Surgery Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Recently, early tumor shrinkage (ETS) was reported to predict outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab (cet). This study was to evaluate the impact of ETS on long-term outcome in patients (pts) with wild-type-KRAS unresectable CLLM receiving cet plus chemotherapy (CT, FOLFIRI or mFOLFOX6). Methods: 138 pts treated in a randomized controlled trial (70 in armA received CT plus cet and 68 in armB received CT alone) previously reported (Jianmin et al, ESMO 2012, abstract-557, ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01564810) were included into this analysis. ETS was defined as a reduction of ≥20% in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions compared to baseline at the first evaluation (8 weeks). Outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: 132 pts were available for evaluation, and ETS occurred more frequently in armA than that in armB (45/68 vs. 26/64, p= .003). Irrespective of treatment arm, pts achieved ETS were associated with longer OS (armA: 38.0 vs. 18.7months, p< .001; armB 30.6 vs.17.7months, p= .003) and PFS (armA: 11.8 vs. 4.8months, p< .001; armB 8.0 vs.4.6months, p= .001) when compared to pts with no-ETS. Among pts with ETS, there were statistic difference between armA and armB in terms of PFS (11.8 vs. 8.0months, p= .041) but not of OS (38.0 vs. 30.6months, p= .30); the converted resection rates for liver metastases were 40.0% (18/45) in armA and 19.2% (5/26) in armB, which were no significantly different (p= .072). For pts without liver surgery, pts observed ETS also gained an increased survival benefit over those no-ETS in armA with regards to OS (p= .01) and PFS (p< .001) though it was not full certified in armB (OS: p= .054; PFS: p= .041). For pts in armA, cet-induced skin toxicity correlated with the occurrence of ETS (p= .048). In addition, cox regression for OS using indicated a hazard ratio of 0.39 (95%CI 0.21–0.72, p = .003). Conclusions: ETS ≥20% at 8 weeks may serve as a predictor of favorable outcome in pts with wild-type-KRAS CLLM receiving cet plus CT.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2013 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 3610)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.3610

Abstract #

3610

Poster Bd #

10D

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts