Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, NA, Italy
Anna Maria Rachiglio , Alessandra Sacco , Matilde Lambiase , Salvatore Tufano , Angela Damato , Alessandra Raimondi , Luca Frassineti , Antonio Pazzola , Alfredo Colombo , Stefania Mosconi , Livio Blasi , Andrea Sartore-Bianchi , Stefano Tamberi , Maura Rossi , Elena Romagnani , Francesca Filiali , Erika Gervasi , Ilenia La Grotteria , Nicola Normanno , Carmine Pinto
Background: In mCRC patients RAS/BRAF testing is usually performed on tissue biopsy in order to select patients for treatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Several studies described discordant RAS status between tissue and cfDNA testing from the same patients. In addition, up to 30% of patients with secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapies become RAS mutant at progression. The LIBImAb study is a phase III, randomized, open-label, comparative, multi-centre trial to assess the superiority in terms of efficacy of bevacizumab versus cetuximab in combination with FOLFIRI chemotherapy in patients with mCRC, RAS/BRAF wild-type on tumor tissue and RAS mutant (RASmut) at liquid biopsy. This study is supported by the Italian Drug Agency (AIFA). We report preliminary data of liquid biopsy testing. Methods: Plasma samples from enrolled patients are analyzed for variants in exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRAS genes and for codon 600 BRAF mutations using the fully automated Idylla system (Biocartis). Patients RASmut on liquid biopsy at baseline are randomized to receive FOLFIRI plus Cetuximab or FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab. Patients RAS wild-type on cfDNA at baseline, are treated with FOLFIRI plus Cetuximab up to 8 cycles and, if not progressed, they are retested for RAS mutations on cfDNA. RASmut patients at re-screening are randomized to continue Cetuximab or to switch to Bevacizumab. Results: Plasma samples from 169 tissue RAS/BRAFwild-type mCRC patients at baseline and 75 patients at 8 cycles of treatment have been tested as of January 31, 2023. Analysis of baseline plasma samples detected 16 RAS mutations in 16/169 patients (9.5%). In particular, 12 KRAS variants (7.1%, 8 in exon 2 and 4 in exon 3) and 4 NRAS variants (2.3%, all in exon 2) were found. The Idylla test also detected 3 BRAFV600 mutations (1.8%) in 3 additional patients. The overall concordance between tissue and cfDNA testing for RAS/BRAF variants was 88.8%. RAS mutations were also detected in 6/75 (8%) plasma samples obtained at 8 cycles of FOLFIRI/cetuximab treatment. The cfDNA test revealed the presence of 5 KRAS (6.7%, 3 in exon 2 and 1 in exon 3) and 1 NRAS mutation (1.3%, exon 2). A BRAFV600 variant was detected in 1 additional patient (1.3%). The rate of RAS/BRAF mutant cases at 8 cycles of treatment was 9.3%. Conclusions: These preliminary data suggest that liquid biopsy might better recapitulate the heterogeneity of mCRC and might be useful in clinical practice to complement tissue testing. The clinical relevance of RAS variants detected in cfDNA will be determined in the LIBImAb trial.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Agustín Barbier
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Angela Damato
2021 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Tanja Mesti
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Nicola Normanno