The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Martin R. Stockler , Felix Hilpert , Michael Friedlander , Madeleine King , Lari B. Wenzel , Chee Lee , Florence Joly , Nikolaus De Gregorio , Jose Angel Arranz Arija , Mansoor Raza Mirza , Roberto Sorio , Ulrich Freudensprung , Vesna Sneller , Gill Hales , Eric Pujade Lauraine
Background: Adding BEV to CT significantly improved PFS in platinum-resistant OC in the open-label phase III AURELIA trial. As symptom improvement is a major goal of treatment, determining effects on HRQoL was a key secondary aim of AURELIA. Methods: After investigator selection of single-agent CT (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, or weekly paclitaxel), patients (pts) with measurable/assessable platinum-resistant OC were randomized to CT ± BEV. HRQoL and symptoms were assessed at baseline and every 2 or 3 cycles (8/9 wks) until PD using the EORTC OC Module (OV28) and FOSI. The primary HRQoL endpoint was an absolute improvement of ≥15% (≥15 points) on the 100-point OV28 subscale for abdominal (abdo)/GI symptoms (items 1–6) at wk 8/9. Pts with missing questionnaires (Qs) were included and considered not to have improved. A sensitivity analysis excluded pts with Qs missing for reasons other than PD/death or switch from CT to BEV. Subgroup analyses of symptomatic pts included only those with a baseline score ≥15 (sufficient to show ≥15-point improvement). Mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis was used to compare Qs from all time points until PD/death, not just wk 8/9. The FOSI was analyzed similarly. Results: Baseline Qs were available from 89% of 361 randomized pts. At wk 8/9, 81% of BEV–CT vs 68% of CT pts who were alive and PD-free returned OV28 Qs. For the primary HRQoL endpoint, more BEV–CT than CT pts had a ≥15% improvement in the OV28 abdo/GI symptom subscale at wk 8/9 (21.9% vs 9.3%, 12.7% difference [95% CI 4.4–20.9]; p = 0.002). The sensitivity analysis described above showed a 13.3% difference [95% CI 4.5–22.1]. In the subgroup of 233 pts with a baseline score ≥15, there was a 16.9% difference (95% CI 6.1–27.6) favoring BEV–CT (29.6% vs 12.7%). MMRM analysis of OV28 abdo/GI symptom subscale scores also favored BEV–CT (6.4-point difference [95% CI 1.28–11.6]). More BEV–CT than CT pts had a ≥15% improvement in FOSI score at wk 8/9 (12.2% vs 3.1%, 9.0% difference [95% CI 2.9–15.2]). Conclusions: Adding BEV to CT resulted in more frequent ≥15% improvements in patient-reported abdo/GI symptoms in platinum-resistant OC. Clinical trial information: NCT00976911.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Gordon Taylor Moffat
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Judith Michels
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: S.P. Somashekhar
2015 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Aristotelis Bamias