Comparative evaluation of capecitabine or infusional leucovorin/5-fluorouracil (LV/5-FU) with or without oxaliplatin (Ox) for stage III colon cancer (CC): A pooled analysis of individual patient data from four randomized controlled trials.

Authors

null

Weijing Sun

Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Weijing Sun , Hans-Joachim Schmoll , Michael O'Connell , Thomas H. Cartwright , Christopher Twelves , Edward McKenna , Wasif M. Saif , Luen F. Lee , Greg Yothers , Daniel G. Haller

Organizations

Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, University Clinic Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Office, Pittsburgh, PA, Ocala Oncology, Ocala, FL, University of Leeds and St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, NSABP Biostatistical Center and University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported
Background: A fluoropyrimidine + Ox is the standard of care for stage III CC but a fluoropyrimidine alone is recommended for selected patients in several practice guidelines. We assessed efficacy and safety of adjuvant capecitabine ± Ox vs. LV/5-FU ± Ox across a population of stage III CC patients enrolled in four trials. Methods: N = 5,819 patients from NSABP C-08, XELOXA, X-ACT, and AVANT were pooled and analyzed; bevacizumab-treated patients were excluded. Endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS, primary), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Multivariate Cox regression analyses (MVA) controlled for age, gender, T, and N stage. Results: Patient demographics and disease characteristics (except lymph nodes examined) were well balanced across groups. The number of patients receiving capecitabine and LV/5-FU were 1,942 and 3,877, respectively. Median follow-up was shorter in NSABP C-08 and AVANT (36 and 50 months) vs. XELOXA and X-ACT (83 and 74 months). Five-year DFS was 62.8% for capecitabine ± Ox and LV/5-FU ± Ox. The capecitabine by Ox interaction was significant for OS with a trend for DFS and RFS; likely due to improved outcomes with capecitabine alone and similar outcomes for capecitabine or LV/5-FU + Ox. Serious adverse event (AE) rates were similar for LV/5-FU- and capecitabine-based therapy (16% vs. 20%, respectively). Overall, treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs were more common with LV/5-FU (59% vs. 47%). Treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs of interest included peripheral sensory neuropathy (5% vs. < 1%), diarrhea (12% vs. 15%), febrile neutropenia (2% vs. < 1%), and hand–foot syndrome (< 1% vs. 12%). Conclusions: Adjuvant capecitabine ± Ox and LV/5-FU ± Ox show comparableefficacy benefits for the treatment of stage III CC; further supporting capecitabine or LV/5-FU-based regimens as standard options for the adjuvant therapy of stage III CC.
Capecitabine ± Ox vs.
LV/5-FU ± Ox
Univariate
MVA
Cox regression HR
95% CI
P Ox interaction HR
95% CI
P
DFS 1.01 .86 1.14 .17
0.92–1.10 0.95–1.37
RFS 1.01 .86 1.15 .15
0.92–1.11 0.95–1.39
OS 1.02 .65 1.33 .01
0.92–1.14 1.06–1.67

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 3525)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.3525

Abstract #

3525

Poster Bd #

17

Abstract Disclosures