Lifetime cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic for prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients (pts) with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and bone metastases (BM): United States managed care perspective.

Authors

null

Michael E. Rader

Nyack Hospital, Nyack, NY

Michael E. Rader , Mark Danese , Ze Cong , Marc Halperin , Yi Qian , Carsten Dietrich Goessl , Karen Chung

Organizations

Nyack Hospital, Nyack, NY, Outcomes Insights, Inc., Westlake Village, CA, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported
Background: Denosumab (Dmab) is superior to zoledronic acid (ZA) for prevention of SREs in pts with CRPC and BM. As Dmab is not cleared renally, it can be used in pts regardless of renal status or concomitant use of nephrotoxic drugs. Previous economic analyses were limited as the analyses were based on short duration-trial based perspectives and/or did not account for disutility associated with IV vs SC administration of ZA and Dmab, respectively. These analyses assess the lifetime cost-effectiveness of Dmab vs ZA in pts with CRPC and BM from a US managed care perspective, with extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses. Methods: A lifetime Markov model was developed, with efficacy of Dmab vs ZA in SRE prevention from a head-to-head phase 3 trial; clinical practice SRE rate in ZA pts from a large commercial claims database analysis; SRE and mode of administration (IV vs SC) quality adjusted life-year (QALY) decrements estimated using the time trade-off method; and SRE costs estimated from a nationally representative commercial claims database. Drug, drug administration, and renal monitoring costs were also included. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% per year. Scenario analyses (including adverse events, drug discontinuation, etc), one-way and multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: Dmab reduced the number of SREs and increased pts’ QALY vs ZA. In the base case and the scenario analyses, cost per QALY gained was below $50,000, which is commonly considered good value. Cost per SRE avoided was below $9,000. In one-way sensitivity analyses, drug costs and SRE rate were the most influential variables. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed the probabilities of Dmab being cost-effective vs ZA were 0.83, 0.94, and 0.98 with willingness-to-pay of $100,000, $150,000 and $200,000 per QALY gained, respectively. Conclusions: Dmab is a cost-effective treatment option in preventing SREs in pts with CRPC and BM compared with ZA from a US managed care perspective. The overall value of Denosumab is based on superior efficacy and more efficient administration.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only

Track

Genitourinary Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr e15172)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e15172

Abstract #

e15172

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Use of bone modifying agents in patients with metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer.

First Author: Aaron Philip Mitchell

Abstract

2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Use of bone modifying agents for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

First Author: Aaron Philip Mitchell