A phase I/II study of the MEK inhibitor BAY 86-9766 (BAY) in combination with gemcitabine (GEM) in patients with nonresectable, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC): Phase I dose-escalation results.

Authors

null

Jean-Luc Van Laethem

Hôpital Universitaire Erasme, Brussels, Belgium

Jean-Luc Van Laethem , Volker Heinemann , Uwe Marc Martens , Jacek Jassem , Patrick Michl , Marc Peeters , Colin D. Weekes , Raphael Maréchal , Jens Stieler , Marius Giurescu , Prabhu Rajagopalan , Vittorio Luigi Garosi , Hanno Riess

Organizations

Hôpital Universitaire Erasme, Brussels, Belgium, Department of Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University of Munich, Munich, Germany, Cancer Center Heilbronn-Franken, Heilbronn, Germany, Akademickie Centrum Kliniczne, Gdansk, Poland, Philipps-University Hospital, Marburg, Germany, UZ Antwerpen, Edegem, Belgium, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany, Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Montville, NJ, Bayer S.p.A., Milan, Italy

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Background: Targeting the RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK pathway may be useful in the treatment of PC, as 75–90% of PCs have KRAS mutation. BAY is an orally bioavailable, potent, allosteric MEK 1/2 inhibitor that showed single-agent activity, and synergistic activity with GEM, in ectopic, orthotopic, syngenic and patient-derived xenograft PC models. Methods: The phase I part aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BAY in combination with GEM, and the pharmacokinetics of BAY and GEM. 3+3 study design was used. After informed consent, eligible patients with advanced PC received GEM 1000 mg/m2 (30-min, once-weekly IV infusion for 7 out of 8 weeks in cycle 1 [C1], and 3 out of 4 weeks in subsequent cycles) and oral BAY 30 mg BID (dose level 1 [DL1]) or 50 mg BID (DL2). No escalation beyond DL2 was planned. MTD was the highest dose at which maximum 1 out of 6 evaluable patients displayed dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) during C1. Results: As of 6 Jan 2012, 17 patients were enrolled and treated (10 at DL1, 7 at DL2). DL1 cohort has completed; DL2 evaluation is ongoing. At DL1, DLTs occurred in 1/6 evaluable patients: a patient with extensive liver metastasis developed chemotherapy-associated steatohepatitis (CASH) and died of hepatic failure. Rare CASH cases have been reported to be associated with GEM alone, but co-involvement of BAY currently cannot be ruled out. To date, 3 patients have completed C1 at DL2 without DLTs. DL2 completion is expected in March 2012. BAY+GEM showed a manageable tolerability profile. The most frequent treatment-related grade 3–4 adverse event (AE) at any DL was neutropenia (n=6). The most frequent clinically relevant BAY-related AE was acneiform rash (n=11), which was mostly grade 1–2 (one case grade 3) and manageable. BAY+GEM showed evidence of clinical efficacy: partial responses were seen in 4/10 patients at DL1 and 1/3 patients at DL2. No pharmacokinetic interaction between BAY and GEM was seen at DL1. Conclusions: In patients with advanced PC, BAY 30 mg BID in combination with GEM had a manageable safety profile, with acneiform rash as the clinically most relevant toxicity attributable to BAY.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Pancreatic Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01251640

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 4050)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.4050

Abstract #

4050

Poster Bd #

42A

Abstract Disclosures