Safety and efficacy of eltrombopag (epag) versus placebo (pbo) for the treatment (tx) of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) in patients with solid tumors receiving gemcitabine (gem)-based chemotherapy (ctx): A phase I study.

Authors

null

Eric S. Winer

Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI

Eric S. Winer , Howard Safran , Boguslawa Karaszewska , Donald A. Richards , Lee Hartner , Frederic Forget , Rodryg Ramlau , Kirushna Kumar , Bhabita Mayer , Brendan Mark Johnson , Conrad A. Messam , Yasser Mostafa Mostafa Kamel

Organizations

Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, Brown University Oncology Group, Providence, RI, Private Practice NZOZ KOMED, Konin, Poland, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX, Pennsylvania Oncology Hematology Associates, Philadelphia, PA, Centre Hospitalier de L'Ardenne, Libramont, Belgium, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Wielkopolskie Centrum Pulmonologii i Torakochirurgii, Poznan, Poland, Meenakshi Mission Hospital and Research Centre, Madurai, India, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, United Kingdom, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, GlaxoSmithKline, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Background: There are limited tx options for CIT. Epag, an oral, small molecule, thrombopoietin-receptor agonist that increases platelet (plt) production, is being explored for tx of CIT. Methods: This was the Ph I portion of a Ph I/II, blinded, pbo-controlled multicenter study in adults with solid tumors and baseline plts ≤300,000µL, who received up to 6 cycles of gem (1000-1250 mg/m2 IV) as monotherapy on Days 1, 8, and 15 Q28 days or Days 1 and 8 Q21 days in combination with cisplatin (50-80 mg/m2 IV Day 1 or divided 1 and 8) or carboplatin (AUC 4-7 IV Day 1). Patients received ctx alone for Cycle 1 and ctx plus epag or matching pbo (randomized 3:1) daily on Days -5 to -1 and 2 to 6 for subsequent cycles. Epag or pbo was interrupted for plts ≥400,000/µL. Results: 33 patients were randomized; 26 received epag or pbo (Table). Data review with an external, independent physician found no safety concerns, and there were sufficient plt increases with a dose of 100 mg epag vs pbo. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported for epag but 1 for pbo. Most AEs were grade 1 or 2. The most common AE in combined epag- and combined pbo-treated groups was neutropenia. Conclusions: Epag was well-tolerated and improved plt counts. Based on these encouraging Ph I results, Ph II using 100 mg epag in thrombocytopenic patients is planned.
Gema
Gem + Cis/Carboa
Pbo
N=4
Epag
N=10
Pbo
N=3
Epag
N=9
Any AEs, n (%) 3 (75) 10 (100) 3 (100) 9 (100)
Tx-related 1 (25) 5 (50) 2 (67) 3 (33)
≥ Grade 3 2 (50) 3 (30) 2 (67) 6 (67)
Liver AEs 0 1 (10) 0 2 (22)
Renal AEs 2 (50) 0 0 3 (33)
Thromboembolic eventsb 0 1 (10) 0 2 (22)
SAEs 1 (25) 2 (20) 1 (33) 5 (56)
Deaths, n (%)c 2 (50) 4 (40)< 1 (33) 3 (33)
Plts: Cycles 2-6, mean (n)
Pre ctx Day 1 309 (4) 443 (9) 314 (3) 442 (9)
Pre ctx Day 8 204 (4) 355 (10) 239 (2) 270 (9)
Pre ctx Day 15 75 (3) 164 (10) - -
Nadir 103 (4) 143 (10) 53 (2) 113 (9)
Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia: Cycle 2-6, n (%) 1 (25) 0 2 (67) 3 (33)

a 7/33 randomized pts never received epag/pbo. b None were considered related to epag and all resolved. One event occurred after stopping epag and following disease progression (PD). cAll deaths were from PD; three additional patients died prior to receiving epag or pbo.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Patient and Survivor Care

Track

Patient and Survivor Care

Sub Track

Palliative Care and Symptom Management

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01147809

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 9117)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.9117

Abstract #

9117

Poster Bd #

47G

Abstract Disclosures