Authors
Christopher Twelves
University of Leeds and St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
Christopher Twelves , Hans-Joachim Schmoll , Michael O'Connell , Thomas H. Cartwright , Edward McKenna , Weijing Sun , Wasif M. Saif , Luen F. Lee , Greg Yothers , Daniel G. Haller
Organizations
University of Leeds and St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom, University Clinic Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Office, Pittsburgh, PA, Ocala Oncology, Ocala, FL, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, NSABP Biostatistical Center and University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA
Background: Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy is the standard of care for stage III colon cancer; however, its impact on PRS in these patients is unclear. We therefore compared PRS in trials of patients with stage III colon cancer treated with oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) or 5-flourouracil (5-FU; FOLFOX) vs. leucovorin/5-FU (LV/5-FU).
Methods: Individual patientdata (N = 4,819) from NSABP C-08, XELOXA, X-ACT, and AVANT were pooled and analyzed by XELOX/FOLFOX vs. LV/5-FU; patients treated with bevacizumab were excluded. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated by Cox regression analyses and multivariate Cox regression analyses controlled for age, gender, T, and N stage. Post-relapse treatment data were collected when available.
Results: Patient demographics and disease characteristics (except lymph nodes examined) were well balanced across analytic groups. Median follow-up was shorter in NSABP C-08 and AVANT (36 and 50 months) than in XELOXA and X-ACT (83 and 74 months). PRS was very similar for XELOX/FOLFOX and LV/5-FU (HR 0.94, 95% CI, 0.82–1.07;
P = .33). Multivariate analyses supported these findings, but showed that PRS was associated with younger age and lower N stage at diagnosis after controlling for gender and T stage. PRS was also comparable for capecitabine or XELOX vs. LV/5-FU or FOLFOX (N = 5,819, HR 1.07, 95% CI, 0.95–1.20;
P = .26). Post-relapse therapies were comparable across the two cohorts.
Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy regimen did not impact on PRS in patients with stage III colon cancer; however, both N stage and age demonstrated independent effects on PRS. Studies have demonstrated significantly improved disease-free and overall survival for oxaliplatin-based therapy, and our data show that survival is not compromised by worsened PRS at subsequent relapse.
Multivariate analysis |
PRS HR |
95% CI |
P |
Randomized treatment: XELOX/FOLFOX vs. LV/5-FU |
0.92 |
0.81–1.05 |
.23 |
Female vs. male |
1.02 |
0.90–1.16 |
.71 |
< 70 vs. ≥ 70 |
0.70 |
0.60–0.81 |
< .0001 |
T1–2 vs. T3–4 |
0.82 |
0.61–1.10 |
.19 |
N1 vs. N2 |
0.73 |
0.64–0.83 |
< .0001 |