Effect of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy on post-relapse survival (PRS) in patients with stage III colon cancer: A pooled analysis of individual patient data from four randomized controlled trials.

Authors

null

Christopher Twelves

University of Leeds and St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom

Christopher Twelves , Hans-Joachim Schmoll , Michael O'Connell , Thomas H. Cartwright , Edward McKenna , Weijing Sun , Wasif M. Saif , Luen F. Lee , Greg Yothers , Daniel G. Haller

Organizations

University of Leeds and St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom, University Clinic Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Office, Pittsburgh, PA, Ocala Oncology, Ocala, FL, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, NSABP Biostatistical Center and University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported
Background: Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy is the standard of care for stage III colon cancer; however, its impact on PRS in these patients is unclear. We therefore compared PRS in trials of patients with stage III colon cancer treated with oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) or 5-flourouracil (5-FU; FOLFOX) vs. leucovorin/5-FU (LV/5-FU). Methods: Individual patientdata (N = 4,819) from NSABP C-08, XELOXA, X-ACT, and AVANT were pooled and analyzed by XELOX/FOLFOX vs. LV/5-FU; patients treated with bevacizumab were excluded. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated by Cox regression analyses and multivariate Cox regression analyses controlled for age, gender, T, and N stage. Post-relapse treatment data were collected when available. Results: Patient demographics and disease characteristics (except lymph nodes examined) were well balanced across analytic groups. Median follow-up was shorter in NSABP C-08 and AVANT (36 and 50 months) than in XELOXA and X-ACT (83 and 74 months). PRS was very similar for XELOX/FOLFOX and LV/5-FU (HR 0.94, 95% CI, 0.82–1.07; P = .33). Multivariate analyses supported these findings, but showed that PRS was associated with younger age and lower N stage at diagnosis after controlling for gender and T stage. PRS was also comparable for capecitabine or XELOX vs. LV/5-FU or FOLFOX (N = 5,819, HR 1.07, 95% CI, 0.95–1.20; P = .26). Post-relapse therapies were comparable across the two cohorts. Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy regimen did not impact on PRS in patients with stage III colon cancer; however, both N stage and age demonstrated independent effects on PRS. Studies have demonstrated significantly improved disease-free and overall survival for oxaliplatin-based therapy, and our data show that survival is not compromised by worsened PRS at subsequent relapse.
Multivariate analysis PRS HR 95% CI P
Randomized treatment:
XELOX/FOLFOX vs. LV/5-FU
0.92 0.81–1.05 .23
Female vs. male 1.02 0.90–1.16 .71
< 70 vs. ≥ 70 0.70 0.60–0.81 < .0001
T1–2 vs. T3–4 0.82 0.61–1.10 .19
N1 vs. N2 0.73 0.64–0.83 < .0001

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 3523)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.3523

Abstract #

3523

Poster Bd #

15

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Implementation of 3 month therapy for stage III colon cancer in a large community practice.

First Author: Victoria Shklar