Multicenter retrospective analysis of systemic chemotherapy for advanced poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the digestive system.

Authors

null

Nozomu Machida

Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan

Nozomu Machida , Tomohiro Yamaguchi , Akiyoshi Kasuga , Hideaki Takahashi , Kentaro Sudo , Tomohiro Nishina , Kazutoshi Tobimatsu , Kenji Ishido , Junji Furuse , Narikazu Boku

Organizations

Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan, National Hospital Organization, Shikoku Cancer Center, Ehime, Japan, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan, Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University East Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University, Kanagawa, Japan

Research Funding

No funding sources reported
Background: No standard regimen is yet established for advanced poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PDNEC) although regimens for small-cell lung carcinoma are usually adopted such as irinotecan + cisplatin (IP) or etoposide + cisplatin (EP). Our aim was to respectively investigate outcomes for advanced PDNEC of the digestive system according to patient characteristics and regimens. Methods: Data was collected from patient medical records at 23 hospitals in Japan. The selection criteria were as follows: 1) histologically proven PDNEC, small cell carcinoma, mixed endocrine-exocrine carcinoma with a PDNEC component, or histologically proven neuroendocrine tumor with rapidly progressive clinical course; 2) primary tumor arising from the gastrointestinal tract (GI) or the hepato-biliary-pancreatic system (HBP); and 3) inoperable or recurrent disease treated with systemic chemotherapy (Cx) between April 2000 and March 2011. Results: This study included 258 patients (males/females, 182/76) with median age of 62.5 years. Primary sites were esophagus/stomach/small bowel/colorectum/hepato-biliary system/pancreas in 85/70/6/31/31/35 patients (pts). According to the primary sites, the median overall survival period (mOS) was 13.4/13.3/29.7/7.6/7.9/8.5 months, and that of GI/HBP was 13.0/7.9 months, respectively. Most common regimen was IP (160 pts, 62%), followed by EP (46 pts, 18%). For IP/EP patients, response rates (RR) were 50%/27%, the median progression free survival periods (mPFS) were 5.2/4.0 months. Second line Cx was performed for 88 pts (55%)/28 pts (61%) and mOS from first line Cx were 13.0/7.3 months in IP/EP groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a primary site of HBP (HR=1.96, p=0.003) and performance status of 2 and more (HR=2.32, p=0.01) were independent unfavorable prognostic factors of PDNEC patients treated with systemic Cx, while the hazard ratio comparing IP with EP was 0.79 (p=0.305). Conclusions: PDNEC of HBP had poorer prognosis than GI. IP was the most common treatment regimen and seemed to show better treatment outcomes than EP.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Pancreatic Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 4046)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.4046

Abstract #

4046

Poster Bd #

41E

Abstract Disclosures