Authors
Derek J. Jonker
The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Derek J. Jonker , Christos Stelios Karapetis , Christopher J. O'Callaghan , Celia Marginean , John Raymond Zalcberg , John Simes , Malcolm J. Moore , Niall Christopher Tebbutt , Timothy Jay Price , Manijeh Daneshmand , Jennifer Hanson , Jeremy David Shapiro , Nick Pavlakis , Peter Gibbs , Guy A. Van Hazel , Ursula Joan Yu Min Lee , Rashida Haq , Shakeel Virk , Dongsheng Tu , Ian Lorimer
Organizations
The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia, NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia, Cabrini Medical Centre and Monash University, Malvern, Australia, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney University, Sydney, Australia, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia, Fraser Valley Cancer Center, Fraser Valley, BC, Canada, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Background: CET, a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor, improves overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with
KRAS wild-type (WT) chemotherapy refractory CRC.
BRAF and
PIK3CA mutation status, and PTEN expression levels may further predict benefit from CET therapy.
Methods: Available colorectal tumour samples were analyzed from a phase III trial of CET plus best supportive care (BSC)
vs BSC alone (NEJM 2007; 357(20)).
BRAF and
PIK3CA mutations (MUT) identified in tumour-derived DNA using a high resolution melting analysis to identify amplicons with mutations were confirmed by sequencing. PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on tissue microarrays constructed from available tumour blocks. For each biomarker, prognostic (treatment independent) effects were assessed in patients on the BSC alone arm. Predictive effects (benefit from CET) on OS and PFS among all patients and those in the
KRAS wild-type subset were examined using a Cox model with tests for treatment-biomarker interaction, adjusting for covariates.
Results: Of 401 pts assessed for
BRAF status (70% of CO17 population), 13(3%) had mutations. Of 407 pts assessed for
PIK3CA status (71% of CO17 population), 61(15%) had mutations. Of 205 pts assessed for PTEN (36% of CO17 population), 148(72%) were negative for IHC expression. No biomarker was
prognostic for OS or PFS, and none were predictive of benefit from CET, either in the whole study population or the
KRAS WT subset.
Conclusions: In chemotherapy-refractory CRC, neither
PIK3CA mutation status nor PTEN expression were predictive of benefit from CET therapy.
BRAF mutations are uncommon in this setting. Larger sample sizes would be required to determine if
BRAF status is predictive for CET benefit.
Biomarker |
Prognostic analysis in BSC patients adj HR (MUT vs WT), [for PTEN, negative vs present]
|
OS |
PFS |
BRAF |
1.47, p=0.41 |
1.52, p=0.37 |
PI3KCA |
1.11, p=0.65 |
1.10, p=0.66 |
PTEN |
1.13, p=0.70 |
0.99, p=0.98 |
BRAF |
1.39, p=0.69 |
1.18, p=0.84 |
PI3KCA |
0.79, p=0.63 |
0.73, p=0.50 |
PTEN |
0.75, p=0.61 |
2.47, p=0.08 |