BRAF, PIK3CA, and PTEN status and benefit from cetuximab (CET) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC): Results from NCIC CTG/AGITG CO.17.

Authors

null

Derek J. Jonker

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Derek J. Jonker , Christos Stelios Karapetis , Christopher J. O'Callaghan , Celia Marginean , John Raymond Zalcberg , John Simes , Malcolm J. Moore , Niall Christopher Tebbutt , Timothy Jay Price , Manijeh Daneshmand , Jennifer Hanson , Jeremy David Shapiro , Nick Pavlakis , Peter Gibbs , Guy A. Van Hazel , Ursula Joan Yu Min Lee , Rashida Haq , Shakeel Virk , Dongsheng Tu , Ian Lorimer

Organizations

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia, NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia, Cabrini Medical Centre and Monash University, Malvern, Australia, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney University, Sydney, Australia, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia, Fraser Valley Cancer Center, Fraser Valley, BC, Canada, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Research Funding

No funding sources reported
Background: CET, a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor, improves overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with KRAS wild-type (WT) chemotherapy refractory CRC. BRAF and PIK3CA mutation status, and PTEN expression levels may further predict benefit from CET therapy. Methods: Available colorectal tumour samples were analyzed from a phase III trial of CET plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC alone (NEJM 2007; 357(20)). BRAF and PIK3CA mutations (MUT) identified in tumour-derived DNA using a high resolution melting analysis to identify amplicons with mutations were confirmed by sequencing. PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on tissue microarrays constructed from available tumour blocks. For each biomarker, prognostic (treatment independent) effects were assessed in patients on the BSC alone arm. Predictive effects (benefit from CET) on OS and PFS among all patients and those in the KRAS wild-type subset were examined using a Cox model with tests for treatment-biomarker interaction, adjusting for covariates. Results: Of 401 pts assessed for BRAF status (70% of CO17 population), 13(3%) had mutations. Of 407 pts assessed for PIK3CA status (71% of CO17 population), 61(15%) had mutations. Of 205 pts assessed for PTEN (36% of CO17 population), 148(72%) were negative for IHC expression. No biomarker was prognostic for OS or PFS, and none were predictive of benefit from CET, either in the whole study population or the KRAS WT subset. Conclusions: In chemotherapy-refractory CRC, neither PIK3CA mutation status nor PTEN expression were predictive of benefit from CET therapy. BRAF mutations are uncommon in this setting. Larger sample sizes would be required to determine if BRAF status is predictive for CET benefit.
Biomarker Prognostic analysis in BSC patients
adj HR (MUT vs WT), [for PTEN, negative vs present]
OS PFS
BRAF 1.47, p=0.41 1.52, p=0.37
PI3KCA 1.11, p=0.65 1.10, p=0.66
PTEN 1.13, p=0.70 0.99, p=0.98
Predictive analysis in KRAS WT subset
adj HR (CET+BSC vs BSC), interaction p value
OS PFS
BRAF 1.39, p=0.69 1.18, p=0.84
PI3KCA 0.79, p=0.63 0.73, p=0.50
PTEN 0.75, p=0.61 2.47, p=0.08

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 3515)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.3515

Abstract #

3515

Poster Bd #

7

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Frequency of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer in an Argentinian population.

First Author: Agustín Barbier

Abstract

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Molecular characteristics of advanced colorectal cancer and multi-hit PIK3CA mutations.

First Author: Michael Cecchini

First Author: Nilesh Verma

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Association of candidate alterations with primary resistance to KRAS G12D targeting in colorectal cancer.

First Author: Khalid Jazieh