ARCHER: Dacomitinib (D; PF-00299804) versus erlotinib (E) for advanced (adv) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—A randomized double-blind phase III study.

Authors

null

Michael J. Boyer

Sydney Cancer Centre, Camperdown, Australia

Michael J. Boyer , Pasi A. Janne , Tony Mok , Kenneth John O'Byrne , Luis G. Paz-Ares , Suresh S. Ramalingam , Jane Q Liang , Ian Taylor , Alicyn Campbell , Joseph P. O'Connell , Stephen P. Letrent , Vladan Antic

Organizations

Sydney Cancer Centre, Camperdown, Australia, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, State Key Laboratory of South China, Sha Tin, Hong Kong, China, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, Pfizer Oncology, Groton, CT, Pfizer Oncology, La Jolla, CA, Pfizer AG, Zurich, Switzerland

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Background: D is a highly selective irreversible small molecule inhibitor of all catalytically active members of the HER (human epidermal growth factor receptor) family of tyrosine kinases. In a randomized phase II trial in patients (pts) who had received 1–2 prior systemic therapy regimens for adv NSCLC, D demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) vs. E in the overall population (12.4 vs. 8.3 weeks; HR=0.66, P=0.012), with benefit consistent across several clinical and molecular subgroups. Median PFS in the KRAS wild-type (WT) subgroup was 16.1 vs. 8.3 weeks for D and E, respectively (HR=0.55, P=0.006). Methods: Based on phase II data, a randomized, double-blinded phase III clinical trial (ARCHER; NCT01360554) was designed to compare the efficacy of D with E in two co-primary populations of pts with adv NSCLC: (a) all enrolled pts with adv NSCLC, and (b) pts with KRAS WT NSCLC. Pts with locally adv/metastatic pathologically confirmed NSCLC, radiologically measurable disease, 1 or 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, ECOG PS 0–2, and tissue available for molecular analysis will be randomized to receive D 45 mg or E 150 mg orally once daily. As of Jan 31, 2012, 117 of a planned 800 pts have been enrolled. The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response, safety and tolerability, and pt-reported outcomes of health-related quality of life and disease-/treatment-related symptoms. Study design provides 90% and 80% power to detect ≥33% and ≥45% improvement in PFS in all pts receiving D vs. E, and in pts with KRAS W T NSCLC, respectively, and HR ≤0.75 and ≤0.69 using a 1-sided stratified log-rank test at a significance level of 0.015 and 0.01, respectively. The final primary analysis stratified log-rank test will include ECOG PS, KRAS mutation status and EGFR mutation status as stratification factors. The sample sizes above will also allow the assessment of OS in the co‑primary populations with adequate power. Post-hoc analyses will be performed to explore EGFR, HER family, and KRAS mutation status, as well as other tumor-derived biomarkers collected from all pts in this trial.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer - Non-small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01360554

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr TPS7615)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.tps7615

Abstract #

TPS7615

Poster Bd #

54A

Abstract Disclosures