Randomized phase II trial of pemetrexed/cisplatin with or without CBP501 in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

Authors

Lee Krug

Lee M. Krug

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Lee M. Krug , Antoinette J. Wozniak , Hedy Lee Kindler , Ronald Feld , Marianna Koczywas , Jose Luis Morero , Cristina P. Rodriguez , Helen J. Ross , Julie E. Bauman , Sergey V Orlov , John C. Ruckdeschel , Alain C. Mita , Luis Fein , Cristian Fernandez , Robert Hall , Takumi Kawabe , Sunil Sharma

Organizations

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, Hospital Maria Ferrer, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, St. Petersburg Pavlov State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute at the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, Centro Oncologico Rosario, Rosario, Brazil, Pharmamar, Colmenar Viejo-Madrid, Spain, ICON, North Wales, PA, CanBas Co Ltd, Shizuoka, Japan, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Background: CBP501, a synthetic duodecapeptide, enhances the cytotoxicity of cisplatin in cell lines and xenografts, including NCI-H226 human mesothelioma. CBP501 increases cisplatin influx into tumor cells through an interaction with calmodulin, and inhibits cell cycle progression by abrogating DNA repair at the G2 checkpoint. Phase I clinical trials combining CBP501 with cisplatin alone or with pemetrexed showed acceptable safety profiles and suggested activity. The most common toxicity of CBP501 is infusion-related urticaria, which is easily managed with diphenhydramine. Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable MPM were stratified by histology (epithelioid vs other) and performance status (PS 0-1 vs 2) and randomized 2:1 to Arm A: pemetrexed/cisplatin plus CBP501 25 mg/m2 IV (42 pts planned), or Arm B: pemetrexed/cisplatin alone at standard doses (21 pts planned). Patients continued on treatment until progression or intolerance; no maintenance therapy was delivered. The primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS) in Arm A; if > 23 of the 42 patients remain free of progression more than 4 months, the combination will be deemed worthy of further study. In addition to standard CT imaging to assess response and PFS, PET scans, pulmonary function tests, and mesothelin levels were performed. Results: Enrollment was completed in October 2011. 65 pts from 14 institutions were randomized, and 63 were treated. Patient characteristics in the two arms were similar and as follows: median age 65, 82% male, 71% epithelioid histology, 8% PS2. Grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities were uncommon, no different than expected from standard chemotherapy, and comparable in the two arms. 70% of patients treated with CBP501 had infusion reactions, all grade 1-2. The best overall response rate in evaluable patients (modified RECIST, investigator assessed) was 12/37 (32%) (95% CI 18-50) in Arm A, and 3/22 (14%) (95% CI 3-35) in Arm B. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 5.5 in Arm A, 5 in Arm B. Conclusions: Data on the primary endpoint of PFS in Arm A are maturing and will be presented at the meeting.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer - Non-small Cell Local-regional/Small Cell/Other Thoracic Cancers

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Mesothelioma

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00700336

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 7029)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.7029

Abstract #

7029

Poster Bd #

21

Abstract Disclosures