Phase II trials of cetuximab (CX) plus cisplatin (CDDP), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and radiation (RT) in immunocompetent (ECOG 3205) and HIV-positive (AMC045) patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCAC): Safety and preliminary efficacy results.

Authors

Madhur Garg

Madhur Garg

Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY

Madhur Garg , Jeanette Y Lee , Lisa A. Kachnic , Paul J. Catalano , David H. Henry , Timothy Patrick Cooley , Lee Ratner , William Wachsman , David Michael Aboulafia , Al Bowen Benson , Joel Palefsky , Richard Whittington , Ronald T. Mitsuyasu , Joseph A. Sparano

Organizations

Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, VASDHS and UCSD School of Med, La Jolla, CA, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, University of California, Los Angeles Care Center, Los Angeles, CA, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY

Research Funding

Other
Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression and HPV infection are common in SCAC. We therefore initiated 2 phase II studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the EGFR inhibitor CX given concurrently with CDDP/5-FU/RT in HIV-positive (AMC045) and immunocompetent (E3205) patients with SCAC. Methods: All patients received CX (400 mg/m2 loading, then 250 mg/m2/wk IV x 6-8 wks) plus CDDP (75 mg/m2 IV q28 days x 2) and 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day IV infusion days 1-4 q 28 days x 2) concurrently with RT (45-54 Gy) beginning with CX dose 2. Patients in E3205 also received 2 cycles of CDDP/5-FU alone prior to CX/CDDP/5-FU/RT; this was discontinued on recommendation of the NCI Anorectal Task Force after 28 patients. Both trials were powered to detect a reduction in 3-year local-regional failure (LRF) rate from 35% to 17.5% (alpha=0.10, beta=0.10), the primary end point. Other endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The results below include complete toxicity and preliminary efficacy data (including only the first 28 patients from E3205). Results: Expedited reporting was required for type I (any grade 5, grade 4 cardiac) or II (grade 4 RT skin, diarrhea) adverse events, with prespecified rates of >5% or >20%, respectively defined as unacceptable. Early stopping rules were not invoked for either trial. LRF rates data will be presented after more detailed case review is completed. Conclusions: CX plus CDDP/5-FU/RT is feasible in patients with SCAC, including patients with HIV infection. Preliminary safety and efficacy data appear encouraging, but accrual without neoadjuvant CDDP/5-FU continues in E3205, and additional followup of both study cohorts is required in order to determine whether pre-specified efficacy endpoints were met.
AMC045 E3205
No. 45 28
Stage I/II/III 24%/42%/34% 11%/50%/39%
Completed protocol therapy 37 (82%) 22 (79%)
Type I/II adverse events 2 (4%)/0 1 (4%)/1 (4%)
Colostomy rate 7% (1-18%) 14% (4-33%)
2 year PFS rate (95% CI) 80% (61-90%) 92% (81-100%)
2 year OS rate (95% CI) 89% (73-96%) 93% (83-100%)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Anal Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00316888 and NCT00324415

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 4030)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.4030

Abstract #

4030

Poster Bd #

22

Abstract Disclosures