Activity of cabozantinib (XL184) in metastatic NSCLC: Results from a phase II randomized discontinuation trial (RDT).

Authors

null

Beth A. Hellerstedt

US Oncology Research, LLC, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands, TX, and Texas Oncology, Central Austin Cancer Center, Austin, TX

Beth A. Hellerstedt , Gerald Edelman , Nicholas J. Vogelzang , Harriet M. Kluger , Christopher A. Yasenchak , Xiaodong Shen , David A. Ramies , Michael S. Gordon , Primo Lara Jr.

Organizations

US Oncology Research, LLC, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands, TX, and Texas Oncology, Central Austin Cancer Center, Austin, TX, Texas Oncology, Irving, TX, US Oncology Research/Comprehensive Cancer Centers NV, Las Vegas, NV, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, Northwest Cancer Specialists, Tualatin, OR, Exelixis, South San Francisco, CA, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Background: Dysregulation of MET and VEGFR2 signaling has been observed in NSCLC and MET upregulation has been implicated in resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Cabozantinib (cabo) is an oral, potent inhibitor of MET and VEGFR2. A RDT evaluated activity and safety in 9 tumor types. Here we report on the metastatic NSCLC cohort which included patients who received prior EGFR and VEGF pathway targeted therapy. Methods: All eligible patients (pts) were required to have measurable disease at baseline. Pts received cabo at 100 mg qd over a 12 wk Lead-in stage. Tumor response (mRECIST) was assessed q6 wks. Treatment ≥ wk 12 was based on response: pts with PR continued open-label cabo, pts with SD were randomized to cabo vs placebo, and pts with PD discontinued. Results: Enrollment to this cohort is complete (n = 60); all pts are unblinded. Baseline characteristics: median age 67 years; adenocarcinoma 72% and squamous cell 28%; 6 pts with known EGFR mutation (of 28 tested), all having received prior erlotinib; bone metastases 20%; median prior lines of therapy 3 (range 0 - 6); prior exposure to anti-EGFR therapy 50%, prior exposure to anti-VEGF pathway therapy 32%. Median follow-up was 2 months (range 0.4 - 22.3 months). At Wk 12, ORR per RECIST was 10% and overall disease control rate (PR+SD) was 40%. Objective tumor regression was observed in 30/47 pts (64%) with post-baseline tumor assessments, some of whom had known driver mutations in KRAS (3 pts) or EGFR (4 pts). 24 pts (40%) completed Lead-in stage with 15 randomized to continue cabo (N = 8) or to placebo (N = 7). No differences with respect to PFS were observed between treatment arms in the randomized phase of the study. Median PFS from study day 1 for all pts was 4.2 months. Most common Grade 3/4 AEs were fatigue (13%), Palmar-plantar erythrodyesthesia (8%), diarrhea (7%) and asthenia (7%); one related Grade 5 AE of hemorrhage was reported during Lead-in stage. Conclusions: Cabo treatment demonstrates activity in heavily pretreated metastatic NSCLC pts with 4.2 months median PFS, 10% RECIST response, and 64% rate of objective tumor regression. The safety profile of cabo was comparable to that seen with other VEGFR TKIs. Future studies are warranted in NSCLC.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer - Non-small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00940225

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 7514)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.7514

Abstract #

7514

Poster Bd #

4

Abstract Disclosures