Updated results from a phase III trial of sunitinib versus placebo in patients with progressive, unresectable, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET).

Authors

null

Aaron Vinik

EVMS Strelitz Diabetes Research Center and Neuroendocrine Unit, Norfolk, VA

Aaron Vinik , Eric Van Cutsem , Patricia Niccoli , Jean-Luc Raoul , Yung-Jue Bang , Ivan Borbath , Juan W. Valle , Peter Metrakos , Denis Smith , Jen-Shi Chen , Dieter Hoersch , Daniel E. Castellano , Hagen F. Kennecke , Joel Picus , Guy Van Hazel , Shem Patyna , Dongrui (Ray) Lu , Richard C. Chao , Eric Raymond

Organizations

EVMS Strelitz Diabetes Research Center and Neuroendocrine Unit, Norfolk, VA, Digestive Oncology Unit, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium, University Hospital Timone, Paoli-Calmettes Institute and RENATEN Network, Marseille, France, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium, Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada, Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Bordeaux, France, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taipei, Taiwan, Zentralkinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia, Pfizer Oncology, La Jolla, CA, Department of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital, Clichy, France

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Background: In a double-blind phase III trial, sunitinib (Sutent; SU) improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo (PBO; 11.4 vs 5.5 mos; HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.26–0.66; P=0.0001) and was well tolerated in patients (pts) with unresectable, well-differentiated pancreatic NET that had progressed ≤12 mos before baseline. Initial overall survival (OS) revealed a benefit for SU vs PBO, although median OS had not been reached. We now report PFS assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) and updated OS. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to SU 37.5 mg or PBO on a continuous daily dosing schedule, each with best supportive care. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS; OS was a secondary endpoint to be evaluated every 2 yrs for 5 yrs, or until 95% of pts had died. Additionally, BICR was performed retrospectively; baseline and on-study CT/MRI scans were evaluated by a 2-reader, 2-time-point lock, followed by a sequential locked-read, batch-mode paradigm by blinded, third-party radiologists. Results: 171 pts were randomized (SU, n=86; PBO, n=85) from Jun 2007 to Apr 2009. The trial ended when an independent data monitoring committee noted efficacy favoring SU and more serious AEs and deaths with PBO. The study was unblinded at closure; pts were offered open-label SU and followed for survival. Median PFS by BICR was 12.6 mos (SU) vs 5.8 mos (PBO) (HR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.18–0.55; P=0.00001). At study closure, there were 9 and 21 deaths in the SU and PBO arms (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.19–0.89; P=0.02). By Apr 2011 (2 yrs additional follow-up) a total of 87 deaths occurred (51%), median OS was estimated at 33.0 mos in the SU arm, and 26.7 mos in the PBO arm (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.47–1.09; P=0.11 [Table]). 69% of pts crossed over to SU on progression. Conclusions: BICR confirmed investigator assessment of PFS and demonstrated a 6.8-mo improvement in median PFS with SU. Updated OS favors SU, although this result is non-significant for reasons that may include crossover of treatment and limited statistical power.
SU
n=86
PBO
n=85
2-yr OS update, Apr 2011
Deaths, n
Censored, n
Median OS (95% CI), mos
40
46
33.0 (25.6–NR)
47
38
26.7 (16.4–35.3)
HR (95% CI) 0.71 (0.47–1.09)
P 0.11

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Other GI Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00428597; NCT00443534; NCT00428220

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 4118)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.4118

Abstract #

4118

Poster Bd #

50E

Abstract Disclosures