Phase I, open-label study of olaparib plus cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors

null

Judith Balmaña

Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain

Judith Balmaña , Nadine M. Tung , Steven J. Isakoff , Begoña Graña , Paula D. Ryan , Rezvan Rafi , Michael Tracy , Eric Winer , José Baselga , Judy Ellen Garber

Organizations

Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Background: Olaparib (AZD2281) is an oral PARP inhibitor active in advanced ovarian and breast cancers. We conducted a multicenter, dose-finding study assessing safety/ tolerability of olaparib capsules plus cisplatin in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors (NCT00782574), for potential use in the neoadjuvant setting. Methods: Pts received 21-day(d) cycles of olaparib, continuously (Cont) or intermittently (Int), plus cisplatin on d1 of each cycle.Each cohort recruited ≥3 evaluable pts with expansion to ≥6 pts if ≥1 had a dose-limiting toxicity. The last cohort was expanded to ensure ≥6 pts completed 4 treatment cycles. Pts who completed 6 combined therapy cycles or who stopped cisplatin due to cisplatin-related toxicity could enter the monotherapy phase (up to 400 mg BID olaparib). Primary objective: safety/ tolerability of ≥4 combined cycles; secondary objectives: pharmacokinetics, antitumor activity. Results: 54 pts received treatment; pts had breast (n=42), ovarian (n=10), pancreatic (n=1) or peritoneal (n=1) cancer. Median number of prior regimens = 4 (1–13). C2, C4 and C6 enrolled >6 pts. Most common grade (G) 3/4 AEs: neutropenia (n=9; 16.7%), leukopenia (n=4; 7.4%), anemia (n=3; 5.6%), vomiting (n=3; 5.6%). In C1–C5, 3 pts had AEs leading to discontinuation: 1 in C2 (thrombocytopenia); 2 in C3 (fatigue; complex migraine, dyspnea). In C6, all pts have ended combination phase and no G3/4 hematologic AEs were seen. Overall, 46% of pts had a dose reduction; 32% due to hematologic AEs. There were no drug-related deaths. 35 pts (65%) completed ≥4 combined cycles (C6, n=8). 18/54 evaluable pts (33%) had an objective response (complete, n=1; partial, n=17); 23 (43%) achieved stable disease. 7 pts (13%) had durable responses on monotherapy for ≥1 year. PK and BRCA1/2 data will be presented. Conclusions: Hematologic AEs led to dose reductions + schedule changes of olaparib with cisplatin 75 mg/m2. Tolerability improved with cisplatin 60 mg/m2. Antitumor activity was seen during combination and olaparib monotherapy phases, with some long responders.
Cohort (C)
1 2 3 4 5 6
Cisplatin, d1/21
Dose (mg/m2) 75 75 75 75 75 60
Olaparib
Dose (mg BID) 50 100 200 100 50 50
Schedule Cont Cont Cont Int
d1–10/21
Int
d1–5/21
Int
d1–5/21
n 3 13 6 14 6 12

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer - Triple-Negative/Cytotoxics/Local Therapy

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00782574

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 1009)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.1009

Abstract #

1009

Poster Bd #

1

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Iwona A. Lugowska

First Author: yuqin xi

First Author: Susanna Varkey Ulahannan