Hearing evaluation of head and neck cancer patients (HNCP): Comparison of adverse event (AE) criteria.

Authors

Alexander Colevas

A. Dimitrios Colevas

Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

A. Dimitrios Colevas , Ruth R Lira , Electra A Colevas , Philip W. Lavori , Kay W Chang

Organizations

Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, Stanford University, stanford, CA, Stanford University Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford, CA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported
Background: The incidence and severity of baseline hearing abnormality in HNCP is poorly characterized, as is the subsequent CDDP associated hearing loss. While formal behavioral audiograms can characterize CDDP associated hearing loss in great detail, most oncologists either rely on subjective evaluation of hearing loss or grade hearing impairment using the CTCAE. Two new grading systems for grading cisplatin ototoxicity have been developed for use in pediatrics, the Brock and Chang systems. This report is the first evaluation of these 3 hearing loss criteria in an adult cancer patient population. Methods: We conducted an electronic medical records (EMR) search for all HNCP between 2004 and 2010 treated at the Stanford Cancer Institute (SCI) and identified which patients had audiograms in the EMR, and who had received CDDP. Three investigators (RL, ADC, KC) independently graded these audiograms using the CTCAE v3 and v4, Brock and Chang criteria. Baseline distributions, changes following CDDP dosing, and inter-observer variability were calculated for hearing impairment grading using all four criteria. Results: We evaluated 460 audiograms in 111 patients. Because 282/460 of the audiograms did not have threshold shifts measured at 1,2,3,4,6 and 8 kHz, CTCAE v4 could not be applied to them . We therefore limited all further comparisons to CTCv3, Brock and Chang criteria. The table below summarizes the analysis. Conclusions: The Brock and Chang ototoxity criteria scales deliver a distribution of hearing AE grades at baseline more compatible than the CTCAE v3 with respect to the expectation that most HNCP do not have severe baseline hearing loss. Both the Brock and Chang scales are more sensitive than the CTCv3 to CDDP associated hearing changes. The Brock scale, followed by the Chang scale, demonstrated highest inter-rater agreement. Additional data concerning performance characteristics and utility of these three grading systems will be presented. Replacement of the present hearing impairment criteria in the CTCAE with either the Brock or Chang scales should be considered.
Ototoxicity scale CTCAE v3 Brock Chang
Baseline median grade 2 0 0
% inter-rater agreement 69 91 80
% with grade changes following CDDP 33 44 47

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Head and Neck Cancer

Track

Head and Neck Cancer

Sub Track

Head and Neck Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 5525)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.5525

Abstract #

5525

Poster Bd #

15

Abstract Disclosures