Phase II trial of sunitinib malate and lomustine in patients with temozolomide refractory recurrent low-grade and anaplastic gliomas.

Authors

Johnny Duerinck

Johnny Duerinck

UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

Johnny Duerinck , Stephanie Du Four , An Van Binst , Hendrik Everaert , Alex Michotte , Jean D'haens , Bart Neyns

Organizations

UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, Uz Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

Research Funding

Other
Background: Recurrent low-grade and anaplastic gliomas eventually transform to a higher grade that is characterized by neo-angiogenesis. Sunitinib inhibits multiple tyrosine kinase receptors (including VEGFR, PDGFR and c-Kit) but has no meaningful activity as a mono-therapy for recurrent glioblastoma when given at a daily dose of 37,5 mg (Neyns et al. J Neurooncol. 2011). We investigated sunitinib in combination with lomustine (CCNU) for the treatment of patients (pts) with temozolomide (TMZ) refractory recurrent low-grade or anaplastic glioma. Methods: Pts received a daily dose of 25 mg sunitinib for 28 consecutive days followed by a 14 days treatment-free interval. CCNU was administered as a single dose (80 mg/m²) on day 14 of a 6w cycle. T1 ± Gd and T2/FLAIR weighted MRI images were obtained q6 wks. 18FET-PET was performed at baseline and reassessed in responding pts. Results: 13 pts were enrolled (mean age 40 [range 33-49]; M/F 8/5; KPS 80-90/70-60: 8/5 pts). All pts had PD following surgery, RT and TMZ. In 7 pts, treatment was initiated at 2nd recurrence, in 4 pts at 3rd recurrence and in 2 pts at the 4th recurrence. Most frequent AEs where fatigue (gr 2: n= 3; gr 3: n= 1), thrombopenia (gr 2: n= 1 gr 3: n= 3 gr4: n= 1), neutropenia (gr 2: n= 2; gr3: n= 2; gr4: n= 2) and lymphopenia (gr 2: n=1; gr 3: n=2; gr 4: n=1). In 5/13 pts CCNU had to be discontinued because of AEs. Treatment with sunitinib was continued in these cases without reoccurrence of AEs. BOR according to RANO criteria: 1 CR, 1 PR (not-confirmed) and 2 SD (DCR: 4/13= 31%). In the patient with CR, FET-PET indicated a complete metabolic response. After a mean FU of 7 mths (range 2 -19), 5 pts are alive. The 6-month PFS is 23% (3/13 pts); median PFS is 1,8 mths (95%CI 1.0 - 2,7). A durable disease control was obtained in 3 pts (TTP respectively 14.8, 11.8+ and 19.2+ mths). Conclusions: in this heavily pretreated population with recurrent low-grade and anaplastic glioma the combination of sunitinib and CCNU is associated with acceptable toxicity and offers a durable progression-free survival in a subgroup of pts. Molecular predictive factors identifying the sensitive population would be needed to justify further clinical investigation of this combination.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Central Nervous System Tumors

Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Sub Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Clinical Trial Registration Number

2007-001561-15

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 2050)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.2050

Abstract #

2050

Poster Bd #

13E

Abstract Disclosures