Phase I trial of ixabepilone and vorinostat in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors

null

Thehang H. Luu

City of Hope, Duarte, CA

Thehang H. Luu , Suzette Blanchard , Jan Hendrik Beumer , Bean N. Anyang , George Somlo , Joanne E. Mortimer , Arti Hurria , Lixin Yang , Yun Yen

Organizations

City of Hope, Duarte, CA, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Background: VOR, an HDAC inhibitor, induces acetylation of tubulin, and decreases resistance by attenuating downstream activation of AKT, c-Raf and HER-2. Patients (pts) with MBC treated with VOR had a TTP of 8.5 months (range 4-14) and stable disease in 29% (Luu et al., 2008). Our preclinical data showed synergistic effect of IXA and VOR in MDA-MB-231 and MCF7. Methods: The primary aims were to: 1) define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on dose limiting toxicities (DLT), and 2) describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of 2 schedules of VOR and IXA. Secondary aims were to describe: 1) response rate (RR) and 2) clinical benefit rate (CBR). The study included: 1) pts with MBC; 2) ECOG PS 0-2; 3) adequate marrow and organ functions; 4) no prior IXA or VOR; and 5) < grade (gr) 1 neuropathy. Stable brain metastasis were allowed. Pts were randomized to schedule A: VOR (QDx14) + IXA (D2) Q21D; or B: VOR (D1-7 and 15-21) + IXA (D2, 9, 16) Q28D. A modified toxicity probability interval design (target toxicity rate= 0.2 and equivalence range +/- 0.05) (Ji et al, 2010) determined dose escalation guidelines. PK were assessed with LC-MS/MS assays. Results: Among 37 pts randomized, 36 were evaluable [median age (55 yrs); median prior chemotherapy regimens (3); ER and/or PR + (64%); HER2 + (19%)]. In cohort A, 16 pts were treated (1 inevaluable). The MTD was: VOR 300mg (QDx14) + IXA (32mg/m2 D2) Q21D (dose level 1). DLT was experienced by 27% (4/15) pts [gr 4 neutropenia, gr 3 fatigue/AST, hyponatremia and allergic reaction to IXA]. In cohort B, 21 pts were treated (dose level 1, n=15; dose level 2, n=6). The MTD was VOR 300mg QD (D1-7 and 15-21) + IXA 16mg/m2 (D2, 9, 16) Q28D (dose level 1), no DLTs were observed. Dose level 2 was closed with 50% (3/6) of pts experiencing DLTs [gr 3 neutropenia, hypertension, and hypokalemia]. Median cycles treated (cohort A: 6, cohort B: 4). Response in cohort A and B respectively was: 1 CR, 2 PR, 7 SD (RR: 20%, CBR: 67%) and 1 CR, 4 PR, 9 SD (RR: 33%, CBR: 93%). VOR and IXA PK were not influenced by the presence of the other drug, clearance values= 220 L/h and 20 L/h/m2, respectively. Conclusions: We established the MTD of VOR and IXA in pts with MBC. The combination demonstrated clinical activity in these heavily pretreated pts. Further studies are recommended.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer - Triple-Negative/Cytotoxics/Local Therapy

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Cytotoxic Chemotherapy

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01084057

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 1070)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.1070

Abstract #

1070

Poster Bd #

23E

Abstract Disclosures