Randomized phase II trial of erlotinib (E) plus high-dose celecoxib (HD-C) or placebo (P) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors

null

Karen L. Reckamp

City of Hope, Duarte, CA

Karen L. Reckamp , Marianna Koczywas , Mihaela C. Cristea , Jonathan Dowell , Brian Gardner , Ginger L Milne , Robert A. Figlin , Robert M. Elashoff , Steven M. Dubinett

Organizations

City of Hope, Duarte, CA, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, Department of Biomathematics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA

Research Funding

NIH
Background: Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-dependent signalling represents a potential mechanism of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in NSCLC. This is mediated in part through an EGFR-independent activation of MAPK/Erk by the COX-2 metabolite PGE2. In addition, PGE2 promotes downregulation of E-cadherin and epithelial to mesenchymal transition. We hypothesize that EGFR and COX-2 inhibition with E and HD-C will augment EGFR TKI efficacy by increasing tumor E-cadherin expression and blocking PGE2-mediated resistance to EGFR inhibition. Methods: Pts with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who progressed following at least one line of therapy or refused standard chemotherapy were randomized to E (150mg/day)/HD-C (600mg/2x day) vs E/P in a 28-day cycle. Pts were stratified by smoking status and ECOG PS. The primary endpoint was PFS with 80% power to detect a 50% improvement; assessments were performed every 2 cycles. Secondary endpoints included response rate, OS and evaluation of molecular markers in tissue and serum to assess targeting COX-2-related pathways and evaluate EGFR TKI-resistance. All pts were required to have pre-treatment tissue available. Results: 107 pts were enrolled with comparable baseline characteristics in both arms. Disease control rate (DCR) was similar in both arms, and a trend toward improved PFS was seen in the E/HD-C arm with HR 0.81 (see Table). Analysis of those with EGFR wild type revealed a significantly increased PFS while those with EGFR mutation had similar PFS in both groups. Safety analysis showed similar toxicity in both arms. Additional biomarker correlations will be presented. Conclusions: The combination of E/C in metastatic NSCLC with HD-C is well tolerated and demonstrates significantly improved efficacy in EGFR wt population. This warrants further study into the COX-2-dependent mechanisms of primary resistance to EGFR TKI therapy. Supported by NIH 1P50 CA90388, K12 CA01727 and medical research funds from the Dept of Veterans’ Affairs.
E/HD-C (n=54) E/P (n=53) p value
PFS (mo) 5.4 2.9 0.31
PFS (EGFR mut, mo) 10.8 9.2 0.73
PFS (EGFR wt, mo) 3.6 1.8 0.045
PFS (EGFR na, mo) 2.7 2.7 0.96
DCR (%) 59 55 0.70

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer - Non-small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00499655

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 7518)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.7518

Abstract #

7518

Poster Bd #

8

Abstract Disclosures