Neoadjuvant accelerated MVAC (AMVAC) in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer: Results of a multicenter phase II study.

Authors

Elizabeth Plimack

Elizabeth R. Plimack

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

Elizabeth R. Plimack , Jean H. Hoffman-Censits , Rosalia Viterbo , Richard Evan Greenberg , David Chen , Costas D. Lallas , Edouard John Trabulsi , Yu-Ning Wong , Alexander Kutikov , Jianqing Lin , Gail Duncan , Beth Adair , Charlotte Cione , Conor O'Sullivan , Deborah Kilpatrick , Eric A Ross , Stephen A. Boorjian , Robert G. Uzzo , William Kevin Kelly , Gary R. Hudes

Organizations

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Research Funding

Other
Background: Standard methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (MVAC) demonstrates a survival benefit in the neoadjuvant setting for patients (pts) with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Compared with standard MVAC, AMVAC yielded higher response rates with less toxicity in the metastatic setting. Methods: Pts with MIBC, cT2-T4a, and N0-N1 with CrCl >=50 and adequate hepatic and marrow function were eligible. Pts received 3 cycles of AMVAC (methotrexate 30 mg/m2, vinblastine 3 mg/m2, doxorubicin 30 mg/m2, cisplatin 70mg/m2) on day 1, with pegfilgrastim 6 mg day 2 or 3, every 2 weeks. Pts with CrCl < 60 could receive cisplatin split over 2 days. Radical cystectomy (RC) with lymph node dissection was performed 4-8 weeks after the last dose of chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Results: Accrual is complete with 44 MIBC pts enrolled at 2 institutions (FCCC, TJU) over a 25 month period. Median age 64 (range 45-83). Three withdrew from study early and are not evaluable for response (2 physician discretion, 1 withdrawal of consent). An additional 8 are currently receiving treatment on study with toxicity and response data pending. Of the 33 evaluable pts for whom final data is available, 30 received all 3 cycles of AMVAC at full dose. Three pts received < 3 cycles due to grade 3 fatigue (1), low platelets (1), and disease progression precluding RC (1). 32/33 pts underwent RC, all within 8 weeks of last chemotherapy. Median time from start of chemotherapy to RC was 9.7 wks (range 4.6-13 wks). 13/33 pts (39.4%, 95% CI, 22.7-56.1%) had a pCR. An additional 3 (9.1%) were downstaged to non muscle invasive disease. For the intent to treat cohort (n=36) 8 pts had grade 3-4 AMVAC related adverse events, the most common being anemia (3), fatigue (3) and neutropenia (2) and overall pCR rate was 36.1%. (95% CI, 20.4-51.8%). All pts will have completed study treatment by April 2012. Final results will be presented. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant AMVAC is well tolerated and preliminary results show a pCR rate similar to that reported for standard 12-week MVAC, suggesting that AMVAC for three cycles (6 weeks) is a safe and efficient alternative.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Genitourinary (Nonprostate) Cancer

Track

Genitourinary Cancer

Sub Track

Bladder Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01031420

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 4526)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.4526

Abstract #

4526

Poster Bd #

5

Abstract Disclosures