Urothelial cancer: Impact of gender on stage at diagnosis and survival.

Authors

null

Jeanne Michelle du Manoir

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Jeanne Michelle du Manoir , Suzanne Richter , Srikala S. Sridhar

Organizations

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Gender differences for disease course and survival in various cancers exist. Gender disparity for both stage at diagnosis and overall survival (OS) has been observed in urothelial cancer (UC). We report a single institution analysis of UC patients treated with chemotherapy to further investigate gender differences in outcomes. Methods: We identified 198 bladder cancer pts treated with chemotherapy since 2002. Chemotherapy was either given as adjuvant or palliative and the most common regimens used were gemcitabine and cisplatin, gemcitabine and carboplatin or gemcitabine alone. Age and stage at diagnosis, sex, smoking status, radiation exposures, bloodwork as a measure of organ dysfunction and overall survival info was collected. Outcomes were compared using Chi Square Statistic. Results: Age at diagnosis, smoking status and prior pelvic radiation were not significantly different (females 66.1 yrs vs males 63.6 yrs; 54% smokers in both groups; 8.3% females vs 7.6% males exposed to radiation). Significantly more females were diagnosed with advanced disease than men (70.8% vs 58.7%, p=0.049) vs earlier stages (stage 0-I) (12.2% vs 35.9%, p=0.03). For patients deceased, OS was not significantly different between genders when analysed for all stages combined (deceased 41.5 vs 39.9 mos), or for those diagnosed only at Stage IV (deceased 12.4 vs 8.6 mos). Of patients still alive at time of review, a survival advantage was apparent for men at all stages (54.8 vs 38.7 months), as well as with stage IV disease (35.9 vs 19.7 months). Gemcitabine-cisplatin was given more often to men with stage IV disease than females (93% vs 63%, p<0.02) despite no difference in organ dysfunction, or ECOG performance status in females. Conclusions: We observed that while both genders are similar with respect to age at UC diagnosis, risk factors exposures (smoking, radiation) and pathological variants, females were diagnosed at later stages, and receive standard first line therapy less often. Our data suggest that this impacts negatively on OS in females diagnosed in earlier disease stages. Further research is needed to identify if we can improve outcome by promoting earlier diagnosis and more aggressive management in earlier disease in females.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session D: Penile, Urethral, Urothelial, and Testicular Cancers

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancer

Sub Track

Urothelial Carcinoma

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl 5; abstr 316)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.5_suppl.316

Abstract #

316

Poster Bd #

D6

Abstract Disclosures