The role of tumor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) polymorphisms in the prediction of clinical outcome for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving first-line sunitinib.

Authors

null

Maristella Bianconi

Scuola di Specializzazione in Oncologia Medica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy

Maristella Bianconi , Mario Scartozzi , Luca Faloppi , Riccardo Giampieri , Elena Maccaroni , Alessandro Bittoni , Michela Del Prete , Cristian Loretelli , Laura Belvederesi , Alessandro Conti , Daniele Minardi , Luciano Burattini , Rodolfo Montironi , Stefano Cascinu

Organizations

Scuola di Specializzazione in Oncologia Medica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, A. O. Ospedali Riuniti-Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy, A. O. Ospedali Riuniti-Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy, Centro Regionale di Genetica Oncologica, A. O. Ospedali Riuniti-Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Centro Regionale di Genetica Oncologica, Ancona, Italy, Scuola di Specializzazione in Urologia, Università Politecnica delle Merche, Ancona, Italy, Clinica di Urologia, AO Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Ancona, Italy, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy, Anatomia Patologica, AO Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) still represents a medical challenge in cancer therapy. In recent years the introduction of new targeted therapies has radically changed the approach to the disease and patients outcome. Currently the therapeutic strongholds are TKIs directed against the VEGF family. The aim of our study is to evaluate the potential predictive and prognostic role of VEGF and VEGFR polymorphisms, in determining the clinical outcome of mRCC patients receiving first-line sunitinib. Methods: 41 histologic samples (biopsies and surgical specimens) of mRCC patients were tested for VEGF-A, VEGF-C and VEGFR-1,2,3 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Patients progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed for first line treatment. Results: VEGF AIV rs833061 C>T polymorphism was statistically significant in PFS (17 months for C vs 4 months for T; P = 0.0029) and OS (35.93 months for C vs 11 months for T; P = 0.0267). VEGF AV rs699947 A>C was statistically significant for PFS (17 months for A vs 3.97 months for C; P = 0.0023) and OS (35.93 months for A vs 10.98 for C; P = 0.0272). VEGF AVI rs2010963 G>C was significant in PFS (16.98 months for G vs 4.65 for G/C vs 2.73 for C; P = 0.0188). VEGR3 III rs6877011 C>G was significant in PFS (8.22 months for C vs 2.22 for C/G; P = 0.0361) and OS (35.93 months for C vs 12.08 for C/G; P = 0.0183). Conclusions: In our analysis patients with C polymorphism of rc833061, A polymorphism rs699947 and G polymorphism of rs2010963 seem to have a better PFS and OS in first line. These polymorphisms of the VEGF-A gene are probably connected with a better control of the neoangiogenesis process during TKIs therapy, maybe leading to vasculature normalization. Patients with C polymorphism of rs6877011 seem equally to have a favourable impact in first line therapy. VEGFR-3 role is still matter of debate but seems to be involved in vessels sprouting and architecture.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session E: Renal Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl 5; abstr 380)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.5_suppl.380

Abstract #

380

Poster Bd #

C3

Abstract Disclosures