Modafinil for fatigue associated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors

null

Elizabeth J. Hovey

Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Elizabeth J. Hovey , Paul L. De Souza , Gavin M. Marx , Phillip Parente , Tal Rapke , Andrew Hill , Antonino Bonaventura , Antonio Michele , Paul Stanley Craft , Ehtesham A. Abdi , Andrew R. Lloyd

Organizations

Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, Australia, Sydney Haematology Oncology Clinics, Sydney, Australia, Box Hill Hospital, Boxhill, Australia, sanofi-aventis Australia, Maquarie Park, Australia, Gold Coast Hospital, Southport, Australia, ANZGOG, Newcastle, Australia, Calvary Hospital North Adelaide, North Adelaide, Australia, The Canberra Hospital, Garran, Australia, The Tweed Hospital, Tweed Heads, Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Chemotherapy-induced fatigue is a common complaint for patients with cancer. We investigated whether modafinil, a psychostimulant, could reduce fatigue in patients on chemotherapy. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study was conducted in patients with metastatic prostate or breast cancer suffering significant chemotherapy-related fatigue whilst undergoing docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Patients were enrolled at the start of their 3rdor subsequent cycles of docetaxel which was continued for up to four further cycles (defined here as ‘treatment periods’). Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive modafinil 200mg daily or placebo for 15 days during each treatment period. Fatigue was evaluated by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI). The primary endpoint was MDASI area under the curve (AUC) during the first 7 days of study medication for the first two treatment periods (possible range 0-70). Other validated tools were used to record disturbances in sleep, mood and functional status. Results: Eighty-three patients (65 with prostate cancer) were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication. The number of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) was 16/55 (29.1%) in the modafinil group and 5/28 (17.9%) in the placebo group. The toxicity profile was largely consistent with docetaxel-based chemotherapy and with previously reported AEs associated with modafinil use in the community; 11 AEs were possibly related to docetaxel; 1 to modafinil and 9 to neither treatment. Conclusions: Managing chemotherapy-related fatigue remains a major challenge. Despite not reaching the primary endpoint, there was a consistent trend towards improvement of chemotherapy-related fatigue in the modafinil arm. Further studies are needed to better understand the clinical implications of these findings. Funding sanofi-aventis; Study ID NCT00917748.


MDASI AUC3-10 scores for the first two treatment periods.

Least squares mean
Treatment period Placebo (N=28) Modafinil (N=55) Difference p

1 & 2* 39.6 35.9 -3.7 [-8.9,1.4] 0.15
1 39.4 38.0 -1.4 [-7.0,4.2] 0.62
2 40.1 33.7 -6.4 [-12.2,-0.6] 0.03

* Primary endpoint. 95% confidence intervals in brackets.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session C: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00917748

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl 5; abstr 211)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.5_suppl.211

Abstract #

211

Poster Bd #

C12

Abstract Disclosures