Relief of bowel-related symptoms with telotristat etiprate in octreotide refractory carcinoid syndrome: Preliminary results of a placebo-controlled, multicenter study.

Authors

null

Thomas M. O'Dorisio

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA

Thomas M. O'Dorisio , Alexandria T. Phan , Robert M. Langdon Jr., Billie J. Marek , Nadeem Ikhlaque , Emily K. Bergsland , Joel Freiman , Linda Law , Phillip Lee Banks , Kenneth Frazier , Jessica Jackson , Brian Zambrowicz , Matthew Kulke

Organizations

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Nebraska Methodist Hospital, Omaha, NE, Texas Oncology, P.A., McAllen, TX, St. Francis Hospital and Health Centers, Beech Grove, IN, University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., The Woodlands, TX, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center and Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Diarrhea associated with carcinoid syndrome (CS) has been attributed to tumor production of serotonin. Telotristat etiprate, (LX1032, LX1606), is an oral inhibitor of peripheral serotonin synthesis. This study explored the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of telotristat etiprate in carcinoid patients with octreotide-refractory diarrhea. Methods: Carcinoid patients with >4 bowel movements (BM)/day on octreotide were randomized 3:1 to receive telotristat etiprate or placebo. Patients enrolled in sequential, escalating dose cohorts of 150, 250, 350, or 500 mg tid, followed by a 500 mg tid expansion cohort. Patients were followed for toxicity, 24-hr urinary 5-HIAA (u5-HIAA) secretion, BM frequency, and self-reported relief of bowel-related symptoms. Subjects were asked “In the past 7 days, have you had adequate relief of your carcinoid syndrome bowel complaints such as diarrhea, urgent need to have a bowel movement, abdominal pain or discomfort?” Responses (yes or no) were analyzed as categorical variables. Results: 16 patients enrolled in the 4 escalating dose cohorts and 7 in the expansion cohort; 18 on telotristat etiprate and 5 on placebo. Median age was 62 yrs with a mean 6.2 BMs/day (range 4-10). AEs included primarily mild-moderate diarrhea, nausea, and abdominal discomfort. In treated subjects, adequate relief was reported as follows: Week 1 – 6/18 (33.3%), Week 2 – 5/16 (31.3%), Week 3 - 5/15 (33.3%), and Week 4 – 6/12 (50.0%). No placebo subjects reported improvement at any timepoint. Biochemical response (>50%reduction in u5-HIAA) and BM response (>30% reduction in daily BM for 2 weeks) were associated with reporting of adequate relief. For evaluable telotristat etiprate-treated patients, 9/16 (56%) experienced a biochemical response and 5/18 (28%) experienced a clinical (BM) response; no placebo subjects achieved either biochemical or clinical response. Conclusions: Treatment with telotristat etiprate was associated with decreases in u5-HIAA and BM frequency, and with self-reported relief of bowel related symptoms. Treatment in an extension phase with open-label telotristat etiprate is ongoing.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session B: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Track

Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00853047

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl 4; abstr 312)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.4_suppl.312

Abstract #

312

Poster Bd #

D34

Abstract Disclosures